Hey Obama, nap time is over!!

[DriveInDriveOut]

And yet you don't seem to understand it.

You set yourself up ... no apology!

.

.

.​

Oh I understand it, that's why I said from a historical perspective not an ideological one.

History shows they were just making up as they went along, so it seems kind of silly to me to defend it.

 

[Catatonic]

Oh I understand it, that's why I said from a historical perspective not an ideological one.

History shows they were just making up as they went along, so it seems kind of silly to me to defend it.

Unless you agree with the principles of why it was done this way.
I am a believer in the Federal structure to governance.

 

[Catatonic]

Oh I understand it, that's why I said from a historical perspective not an ideological one.

History shows they were just making up as they went along, so it seems kind of silly to me to defend it.

So you think making stuff up today is superior to then?
I think they are about the same

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

So you think making stuff up today is superior to then?
I think they are about the same

I think everything is open for discussion and the writers of the constitution knew that, obviously.

 

[Catatonic]

I think everything is open for discussion and the writers of the constitution knew that, obviously.

Yes, they even stated that.

 

[moreluck]

That quite possibly is the dumbest rebuttal ever.

"Since so and so doesn't care, why should I?"

Try using that argument with all of the other countries we consider friends.

It's about the AIR.....like china breathes a different air than us.

 

[MrFedEx]

It's about the AIR.....like china breathes a different air than us.

I guess NASA gives you weekends off, huh?

 

[MrFedEx]

I think everything is open for discussion and the writers of the constitution knew that, obviously.

Antonin Scalia believed he could read the minds of the founders, hence his originalist stance. So, no. It isn't open for discussion.

 

[newfie]

Antonin Scalia believed he could read the minds of the founders, hence his originalist stance. So, no. It isn't open for discussion.

he believed in interrupting original intent yes , you are correct. need a Kleenex yet?

 

[MrFedEx]

he believed in interrupting original intent yes , you are correct. need a Kleenex yet?

No, but you will when Trump resigns or is forced out.

 

[newfie]

No, but you will when Trump resigns or is forced out.

you see any purple dragons when you smoke that weed?

 

[MrFedEx]

you see any purple dragons when you smoke that weed?

DOT, so I don't do drugs. See what happens when dogs eat their own ?

 

[BrownArmy]

he believed in interrupting original intent yes , you are correct. need a Kleenex yet?

Forget the Kleenex.

Scalia had a special mind as to the 'original intent'?

Please.

 

[Ghost in the Darkness]

I think everything is open for discussion and the writers of the constitution knew that, obviously.

Gov't needs limitations. Thats why we have Constitutional rights. Do you own guns? I think you said you did right, why would you support the gov't having any kind of in to infringe that right?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

why would you support the gov't having any kind of in to infringe that right?

I don't that's why I didn't vote for Trump or Hillary.

 

[BrownArmy]

Gov't needs limitations. Thats why we have Constitutional rights. Do you own guns? I think you said you did right, why would you support the gov't having any kind of in to infringe that right?

Trump loves the uneducated, case in point.

 

[newfie]

DOT, so I don't do drugs. See what happens when dogs eat their own ?

I give up what happens to you?

 

[Ghost in the Darkness]

Poor way to defend your Constitutional rights. You know what Hillary was all about. I'm not saying Trump was a great choice by any means, but between he and Hillary it wasnt that difficult to choose. I was torn early on after the primary election whether or not to vote for him. In the end I knew not voting for him was a vote for Hillary. I atleast feel confident the 2nd Amendment is one thing he won't waffle on.

 

[Ghost in the Darkness]

Trump loves the uneducated, case in point.

Yeah you just roll over. Do you have him grease up or do you prefer it raw?

 

[BrownArmy]

Poor way to defend your Constitutional rights. You know what Hillary was all about. I'm not saying Trump was a great choice by any means, but between he and Hillary it wasnt that difficult to choose. I was torn early on after the primary election whether or not to vote for him. In the end I knew not voting for him was a vote for Hillary. I atleast feel confident the 2nd Amendment is one thing he won't waffle on.

Trump doesn't give a $ about the 2nd amendment, come back tomorrow.