I Voted No

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
How exactly is the company going to create all these new jobs? That would require growth.
Might seem shocking to you, but we just took two huge medical accounts with 25 and $30 million each from FedEx yesterday we start picking them up today thousands and thousands the next day air packages a week at both pick ups. Growth will happen.
 

Wally

BrownCafe Innovator & King of Puns
Might seem shocking to you, but we just took two huge medical accounts with 25 and $30 million each from FedEx yesterday we start picking them up today thousands and thousands the next day air packages a week at both pick ups. Growth will happen.
For how long? A few pickups won't change a thing anyway.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
For how long? A few pickups won't change a thing anyway.
What do you mean for how long? They sign multiyear contracts. FedEx service is so abysmal They were just waiting for the Teamsters and UPS to finalize the deal. Those are the kind of accounts UPS wants. We will win those kind of accounts all over the country in the coming months in years just like we always do FedEx is in disarray.
 

Wally

BrownCafe Innovator & King of Puns
What do you mean for how long? They sign multiyear contracts. FedEx service is so abysmal They were just waiting for the Teamsters and UPS to finalize the deal. Those are the kind of accounts UPS wants.
Right, and they are walking away from others. More profit but not necessarily more jobs.
 

Karma...

Well-Known Member
the problem is that while ups is paying a great overall compensation the union wont divvy up the money so that the pters get their fair share while subsidizing the fters...its communistic.....most pters wont last to retirement........dont blames ups for this situation but the onus is squarely on the union......perspective is such that pters do get ft benefits while working half the hours.......this situation has been a long time and Sean is doing a great job in rectifying this pt/ft inequality.. it wont happen satisfactory in this contract but in a huge step in the correct direction........I would vote a tepid yes
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
the problem is that while ups is paying a great overall compensation the union wont divvy up the money so that the pters get their fair share while subsidizing the fters...its communistic.....most pters wont last to retirement........dont blames ups for this situation but the onus is squarely on the union......perspective is such that pters do get ft benefits while working half the hours.......this situation has been a long time and Sean is doing a great job in rectifying this pt/ft inequality.. it wont happen satisfactory in this contract but in a huge step in the correct direction........I would vote a tepid yes
1692203008464.gif
 

Wally

BrownCafe Innovator & King of Puns
the problem is that while ups is paying a great overall compensation the union wont divvy up the money so that the pters get their fair share while subsidizing the fters...its communistic.....most pters wont last to retirement........dont blames ups for this situation but the onus is squarely on the union......perspective is such that pters do get ft benefits while working half the hours.......this situation has been a long time and Sean is doing a great job in rectifying this pt/ft inequality.. it wont happen satisfactory in this contract but in a huge step in the correct direction........I would vote a tepid yes
You take what we give you and like it!
 
Top