Sportello
Well-Known Member
Dude, really?
Liberal / Conservative
- Thread starter moreluck
- Start date
ImWaitingForTheDay
Annoy a conservative....Think for yourself
Ya what he said...Prove it
Sportello
Well-Known Member
Big hat, no cattle.
Or as we say in the city...'talkin' loud, sayin' nothing'
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Like I said earlier.
After you post that REAL STUDY, not a liberal term paper, I'll post mine.
But you still can't find a real study about your claim.
So sad.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
The TROLL PATROL'S favorite scientist Stephanie Pappas.
Who, in addition to writing several Yoga books is also a "science" writer for livescience. (notice the quotes around science)
Some of her excellent science articles include:
Why gay parents may be the best parents. Jan 15, 2012
Depression soars in obese seniors. Mar 24, 2011
Negative portrayals of Muslims get more media attention. Nov 29, 2012
Bumpier flights ahead on warming planet, study suggests. Apr 8, 2013
Space Buddha statue may be fake. Oct 24, 2012
In self control, dogs are only human. Apr 3, 2012
Is April a month prone to mass violence? Apr 16, 2013
Booty call, how to spot a fertile woman. Oct 17, 2010
Oh yes, this is the TROLL PATROL hero of the hour.
I hear she is specially liked by waiting troll and sporty troll.
Face it waitingfortheday. You lost.
Sportello
Well-Known Member
So a college professor, from a real university, publishes a peer reviewed paper, and you dismiss it because what an editorial columnist opines? What constitutes a REAL STUDY for you? Not a published paper from a university professor who specializes in the subject, but an opinion from a political operative that shares your view?
Proceed
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Sportello
Well-Known Member
What in the world are you talking about? The link to the study had nothing to do with the columnist that compiled the piece. The author of the piece compiles from papers and puts them in an online magazine. Her article links to a scientific paper that I directly linked for you. She is not the author of the study.
Are you being deliberately obtuse, or are you unable to see the difference? It's interesting that you take the word of an editorial with the opposite view, and much more partisan in tenor, as fact, but reject a reasoned explanation of an actual study as bunk.
If you want to carry on a discussion/argument, try to stay on subject. Don't make up an answer to a question that never existed, like above.
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
b
That's one of the weirdest statements I've ever read on the BC.
Most 'hard scientists' are conservative? Says who?
What defines a 'hard scientist'?
WTF are you talking about?
That's one of the weirdest statements I've ever read on the BC.
Most 'hard scientists' are conservative? Says who?
What defines a 'hard scientist'?
WTF are you talking about?
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
After reading this thread, that is what you have issues with?
Nothing on Conservatives have low IQ's and are racists?
Doesn't bother you?
Even though absolutely no proof is given?
Hmmmm.
Sportello
Well-Known Member
Hard science generally means natural vs social science. Social science is soft. natural is hard. Biology and Chemistry are hard sciences, as is atmospheric science. Anthropology and psychiatry, as well as sociology would be soft.
One is not superior to the other, and a wise person would be aware of all facets of science, and how it affects humankind.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
A few problems with that so called study.
As Forbes points out.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timwors...fic-paper-conservatives-are-stoopid-so-there/
That racism and homophobia are attributed to economic disadvantage. (the poor have less educational opportunities)
Another problem, is half of this study is in England.
Where conservatism and racism don't go hand and hand. (Unless you want to describe racism as just being right wing)
And lastly. Conservative want lower tax rates and lower taxes. That means the government will have less to give to the disadvantaged. The disadvantage are typically people of color. So the study says that by wanting this, conservatives are racist.
So, most of your STUDY, says conservatives are racists because they want lower taxes.
You have got to be kidding me.
This whole time I thought the racists were the liberal Democrats, who imported blacks into the country for slavery.
Kept them in slavery for over a hundred years in this country.
Fought to keep them in slavery in the Civil War.
Fought giving them citizenship.
Fought giving them the right to vote.
Fought giving them equal rights.
Am I missing something here? (TROLLS NEED NOT ANSWER)
Sportello
Well-Known Member
Polly want a cracker? You are just parroting and you know it.
Well, they (slave holders) were Democrats at one point, Colonialists before that, even Founding Fathers. They were never 'liberal' in the modern sense. That's where your mistake is.
Work on that GED, get a day job, move to a RTW state, and prosper. Better hope that social services don't get cut, i have a feeling you and your family will need them before it's all over.
ImWaitingForTheDay
Annoy a conservative....Think for yourself
I don't have to dream up anything witty, WE should just be glad that we have a front-row seat to laugh at all these Republic-TeaCons science-deniers..
ImWaitingForTheDay
Annoy a conservative....Think for yourself
ImWaitingForTheDay
Annoy a conservative....Think for yourself
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
.
Does it make you feel better about yourself?
Because it doesn't mean anything.
It doesn't change anything.
Another liberal waste of time piece of garbage.
Another study by those who hate conservatives in England.
Does it make you feel better about yourself?
Because it doesn't mean anything.
It doesn't change anything.
Another liberal waste of time piece of garbage.
BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
No, because what you just described is chaff that I dismiss immediately.
It's absolutist.
It's clearly bull for anyone to claim that all 'conservatives' are racist and low-IQ.
You're not innocent in this however; your blanket definition of 'liberals' mirrors what you rail against.
In either case, using your terminology, 'back it up with facts'.
Show me somewhere how 'most hard-scientists are conservative'.
I only commented about your phrase because it's such a non-sequitur.
realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
You dismissed ImWaitingForTheDay's so called study, but take issue with a statement by oldngray?
You make no sense.
Which doesn't surprise me considering who you hang with.
And liberals are EXACTLY how I describe them.
If you have a problem with that, I wouldn't be surprised one bit.
Your side has problems seeing reality, and just seeing what you want to.
Similar threads
