Right... Rofl.How much did the contents weigh? Anything missing or damaged?
If such a box came through my station (and they do), it would have been sent to QA to be repacked...
Speculation. Perhaps it weighed only 10 pounds. At Station One, every package stays upright and is rolled carefully down the belt. At the real FedEx, it could have an 150 lb ingot loaded on top of it as it speeds long a 30 mph belt and gets rammed by a "package selection device".
This is how a package sent by our company via FedEx Express from Canada arrived at the receiving doc at a hospital in the US last week. The recipient notified us of the condition of the box and we asked that they take a few pictures of it. We emailed the photos to FedEx Canada and got a form letter back (from fedex canadacustomerservice) that gave no indication that a person looked at them.
I suspect that the box was torn apart on purpose - either by an employee looking for drugs, or during the course of a US customs check. How could a box, in such a vulnerable condition, be handled through the delivery chain without losing any contents? Why did nobody at fedex even attempt to patch the box with duct tape?
View attachment 54851 View attachment 54850
No. It was improperly packed (and shifted in the box) and/or the box was obviously old, as other posters have noted. It doesn't take a lot of weight shifting around to do that to an old box.
Any box can look old pretty fast after a day or two in our system. In other words, you are protecting the company, just as you are told to do. Good boy.
Or better yet, why don't you just leave?Like all the others said, it was a crappy box. Stop arguing for the sake of arguing. It makes you look petty.
I suspect that the box was torn apart on purpose - either by an employee looking for drugs, or during the course of a US customs check.
.
Or better yet, why don't you just leave?
Like all the others said, it was a crappy box. Stop arguing for the sake of arguing. It makes you look petty.
Improper packaging, customer claim denied
Stop arguing for the sake of arguing. It makes you look petty.
In my few years of actively posting on BC, I've noticed that the arguments that you speak of rarely happen until you show up.
I...cannot find anything wrong with that statement.It's the convoluted histrionic theatrics that follow that are a bit much.