DEA successfully eliminated qualudes with a strategy targeting its manufacture.Chill out Dude ... sounds like you could use a Lude, man. Used mine up 30 years ago...can't help
RIVERSIDE — A 66-year-old United Parcel Service employee suspected of diverting goods from the Riverside UPS distribution center where she worked to her daughters' homes is due in court next month, a lieutenant said Thursday.
http://gannett.gcion.com/?adlink/5111/158698/0/170/AdId=34249;BnId=1;itime=651006135;
Donna May of Devore was jailed at the Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility on suspicion of grand theft and embezzlement on Oct. 3, following an eight-month investigation, according to Riverside police Lt. Victor Williams.
She was released the following day in lieu of $5,000 bail and is due at the Riverside courthouse on Nov. 3 for arraignment, he said.
The investigation began at the distribution center at 1391 Spruce St. in Riverside, where May worked, the lieutenant said.
“The investigation revealed a 20-year UPS employee was involved in an elaborate theft scheme in which items being shipped through the UPS facility would be diverted to another location where criminals, whom the items were not intended for, would receive them,” Williams said.
The homes, those of May's daughters, were being used as drop-off points for stolen items such as laptop computers, hand-held electronics, televisions, furniture, paintings, cutlery, kitchen appliances and other items, investigators allege.
Riverside police Detective Kevin Townsend said the daughters told him they thought their mother was ordering items to furnish a new home, since her old one had burned down.
The retail value of the goods amounted to more than $25,000, he said.
I agree hes guilty of being in possesion of stolen goods because possesion is 9/10ths of the law. The point is he was not charged with that he was charged with stealing the phone.
We don't know if he stole it or if he bought it. You don't know either. You know what he tells you and others. We do know he was in possession of a stolen phone thus the charge. To me there really is no difference between stealing it and buying it stolen.
If i was on trial for murder and during the court hearing i admitted that i jay walked, and was found innocent of the murder they would not find me guilty of jaywalking. Thats not the crime i was charged with.
If you were found in possession of a murdered body you would have a hard time winning the case in court. At the panel however possession is not enough ups has to have someone that says they saw you kill the guy. One of the benifits of a panel.
Why? Because ups management says hes a bad guy? This could have been you! Look he bought the phone, not on ups's time, not in a ups uniform and in a parking lot that ups is not held accountable if your car is vanadlized, broken into or stolen from!
He either bought a brand new blackberry stolen from one of our customers or he stole it. If we don't put a stop to the thievery then we won't have jobs to return to.
You ever have a sup that just didnt like you? by your post im sure you have pissed someone off at some point and time or you could just be a little company suck hole! Which is it.
Your going off on a tangent now Red. Some supervisor that does not like your guy did not instruct him to buy a stolen phone. Thanks for attacking me in order to defend your thief.
Tie unless you just admitted to having multiple user accounts i did not attack YOU.I agree hes guilty of being in possesion of stolen goods because possesion is 9/10ths of the law. The point is he was not charged with that he was charged with stealing the phone.
We don't know if he stole it or if he bought it. You don't know either. You know what he tells you and others. We do know he was in possession of a stolen phone thus the charge. To me there really is no difference between stealing it and buying it stolen.
If i was on trial for murder and during the court hearing i admitted that i jay walked, and was found innocent of the murder they would not find me guilty of jaywalking. Thats not the crime i was charged with.
If you were found in possession of a murdered body you would have a hard time winning the case in court. At the panel however possession is not enough ups has to have someone that says they saw you kill the guy. One of the benifits of a panel.
Why? Because ups management says hes a bad guy? This could have been you! Look he bought the phone, not on ups's time, not in a ups uniform and in a parking lot that ups is not held accountable if your car is vanadlized, broken into or stolen from!
He either bought a brand new blackberry stolen from one of our customers or he stole it. If we don't put a stop to the thievery then we won't have jobs to return to.
You ever have a sup that just didnt like you? by your post im sure you have pissed someone off at some point and time or you could just be a little company suck hole! Which is it.
Your going off on a tangent now Red. Some supervisor that does not like your guy did not instruct him to buy a stolen phone. Thanks for attacking me in order to defend your thief.
=
You ever have a sup that just didnt like you? by your post im sure you have pissed someone off at some point and time or you could just be a little company suck hole! Which is it?
Was that psot after yours or finnadict? Someone need a hug today? Feeling a little more insecure than normal?Not sure Red could be a kiss , perhaps a chicago hug but it did kinda look like you took a shot at me in defense of your thief?
guys
my suggestion is that we let the court decide what is real and what is not. anything else is counter productive.
bottom line is that sometimes lp gets a bit too excited about catching a thief and thinks they are doing a good job, when in fact they are doing a lot of what you are doing here, making statements about what you think instead of what really is.
lets just see what happens when he gets his day in court.
d
company does not pursue charges. this is not a civil case. The DA looks at the evidence and decides to prosecute if the evidence is there. The real question here is why is the DA pursuing this lowly theft case against this guy. There must be some pretty damning evidence.Lets break this whole thing down to the basics;we don't know that for sure. we do know he says he bought it brand new at a 75 percent discount.
- The employee was NOT caught stealing. He bought a phone which later proved to be stolen by a different employee, who had NOT yet been caught or accused of theft.
never suspecting he would get caught. Thieves have done dumber things.
- The employee voluntarily registered the phone...with serial#....with the Loss Prevention department of the company from whom he supposedly stole it.
possession of a stolen goods is a crime.
- Posession of stolen goods is not in and of itself a crime. The burden of proof rests with the prosecution to prove that you KNEW it was stolen. There must be criminal intent. If you buy a ring at a pawnshop or used jewelry store, and the ring is subsequently proven to have been stolen, you are not guilty of a crime.
company has to prove he stole it. Almost impossible to do unless you get an eye witness who is non union to provide a statement.
- A grievance panel...composed of equal union AND management representatives...decided to give this employee his job back.
- Upon what basis then....does a company pursue criminal charges against an employee who has been determined by a panel of its own representatives to be NOT GUILTY of the crime?
company has to prove he stole it. Almost impossible to do unless you get an eye witness who is non union to provide a statement.
So Red is saying that these thieves stole cell phones, were caught and fired for it, then came back to UPS to sell it on their property at a later date? And this guy was completely innocent, had no idea about these people?
That smells of bull. C'mon are you telling me the bulk driver ( who comes to face with most every person in the building no matter what the oepration -center or hub - had no idea of what went on?