Like I said read the 2nd Amendment, or better yet go back to sleep. Maybe let them sheer your wool first, somebody could use a sweater.
You havent the first clue what you are talking about.
I asked you to present anywhere in the constitution that shows the words TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT or OPPRESSIVE GOVERNMENT appear and you have failed to do so.
You keep asking us to READ the second amendment, but I dont know why? It doesnt support your point of view in the least, but then again, all you have is political rhetoric to support anything you say.
You talk about committing "terrorism" in this country by calling for a "War".. but you hardly understand what that entails. You further that stupidity by trying to justify it by calling it a "Civil War", but again, you dont understand what that even means.
Its clear, your intelligence is lacking and your history flawed but let me see if I can help you understand the difference between a "WAR" and a "Civil War"...
First, in order to have a "civil war", you have to have two sides. The country would have to be split into two parts. The original civil war was a war between two countries, the north vs the south. Each had a president, a congress and an army. The fight was for control of the nation as a whole.
YOU, dont have a President, a congress or an army. Just a bunch of rednecked ignoramuses with guns and an 8th grade education behind it threatening the sovereignty of the United States just because you dont like a decision.
Justice Scalia wrote in his majority opinion in the Heller case ( not that you would know or understand that either) that guns rights were not universal, and reasonable regulations could be imposed by the states. He also wrote that states could ban assault style weapons and ammo and furthered that GUN regulations were constitutional.
In the decision, the SCOTUS only ruled that a HANDGUN was allowed to be kept in the home and could not be banned, but there was no guarantee that a shotgun or rifle could be kept.
IN reality, maybe you should attack the supreme court of the United States for going against you?
What you are calling for, is an undeclared war between malcontents and the government of the United States of America.
To somehow believe, that policemen and the military could possibly take sides with malcontents is laughable at best, and the suggestion indicative of your lack of understanding of reality.
Maybe a remedial class in history or government 101 could assist you.
TOS.