1 in 4 women have abortions? Wow.
- Thread starter quad decade guy
- Start date
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
rod
Retired 22 years
EVERYTHING was cheaper with Trump
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
I've been told by left wingers on this site that using the word fight is insighting an insurrection or something stupid like that.
Bad idea for either side to do it when extremists on both sides are looking for a reason to rock and roll.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Fight is a common political term used by both sides, it doesn't really bother me. My issue is that Democrats are openly saying these people should protest to influence the court.
That is the opposite of the way our system should work. An independent judiciary free from public influence interprets the constitutionality of laws. If the majority of the public wanted segregation the supreme court should say it's legal? I mean Democrats really are the anti American party at this point.
100% agree.
This guy gets it. One can be pro-choice but also admit that there aren't constitutional grounds to uphold Roe. No need to listen. Just glad there are still thinkers in academia who are willing to admit they're thinkers.
www.honestlypod.com
"Akhil Reed Amar is the Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale university, where he’s been teaching constitutional law since the ripe old age of 26. He is the author of more than a hundred law review articles and several award-winning books. Amar’s work has been cited in more than 40 supreme court cases—more than anyone else in his generation—including in the shocking draft opinion by Justice Alito that was leaked to the press last week.
What may be confusing about that is that Amar is a self-described liberal, pro-choice Democrat. So why is Alito citing his work in an opinion to overturn Roe? Today, Amar explains why he, in fact, agrees with Alito, what overturning Roe might mean for the country, what the leak says about the culture of American law, and what supporters of legal abortion, like himself, should do now."
Latest Episodes | Honestly Podcast
www.honestlypod.com
"Akhil Reed Amar is the Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale university, where he’s been teaching constitutional law since the ripe old age of 26. He is the author of more than a hundred law review articles and several award-winning books. Amar’s work has been cited in more than 40 supreme court cases—more than anyone else in his generation—including in the shocking draft opinion by Justice Alito that was leaked to the press last week.
What may be confusing about that is that Amar is a self-described liberal, pro-choice Democrat. So why is Alito citing his work in an opinion to overturn Roe? Today, Amar explains why he, in fact, agrees with Alito, what overturning Roe might mean for the country, what the leak says about the culture of American law, and what supporters of legal abortion, like himself, should do now."
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
No one in the legal field defends roe v wade on it's constitutional grounds, because it was a garbage ruling and everyone knows it.This guy gets it. One can be pro-choice but also admit that there aren't constitutional grounds to uphold Roe. No need to listen. Just glad there are still thinkers in academia who are willing to admit they're thinkers.
Latest Episodes | Honestly Podcast
"Akhil Reed Amar is the Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale university, where he’s been teaching constitutional law since the ripe old age of 26. He is the author of more than a hundred law review articles and several award-winning books. Amar’s work has been cited in more than 40 supreme court cases—more than anyone else in his generation—including in the shocking draft opinion by Justice Alito that was leaked to the press last week.
What may be confusing about that is that Amar is a self-described liberal, pro-choice Democrat. So why is Alito citing his work in an opinion to overturn Roe? Today, Amar explains why he, in fact, agrees with Alito, what overturning Roe might mean for the country, what the leak says about the culture of American law, and what supporters of legal abortion, like himself, should do now."
Even the left wing lawyer that fought against the MS law that gets us the new ruling didn't try.
floridays
Well-Known Member
He's the "Orangeman," I'm sure he did.
floridays
Well-Known Member
Academia and truth have little in common,This guy gets it. One can be pro-choice but also admit that there aren't constitutional grounds to uphold Roe. No need to listen. Just glad there are still thinkers in academia who are willing to admit they're thinkers.
Latest Episodes | Honestly Podcast
"Akhil Reed Amar is the Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale university, where he’s been teaching constitutional law since the ripe old age of 26. He is the author of more than a hundred law review articles and several award-winning books. Amar’s work has been cited in more than 40 supreme court cases—more than anyone else in his generation—including in the shocking draft opinion by Justice Alito that was leaked to the press last week.
What may be confusing about that is that Amar is a self-described liberal, pro-choice Democrat. So why is Alito citing his work in an opinion to overturn Roe? Today, Amar explains why he, in fact, agrees with Alito, what overturning Roe might mean for the country, what the leak says about the culture of American law, and what supporters of legal abortion, like himself, should do now."
Btw, thinking was not needed to find a Constitutional ground for Roe, it didn't exist, it took what it did, Justices that had no regard for the Constitution to opine when the convenient opportunity presented.
Sorry for bad English, the King's or Queen's, I'm illiterate. @Fred's Myth
@59 Dano, i'm trying to learn you somethins
floridays
Well-Known Member
Not true, ask a dissenter. You hang around with libs.But they generally won’t say it for fear of the mob.
First qualificaton is to dissent, most repubics of position don't because they have paid for or in some other way been a party to the act.
Call'in a spade a spade.
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
Martial Law would be even worse, I declare!
floridays
Well-Known Member
That will not happen, they control their mob just to be inside what they feel the public will deem as responsible, required and with the bounds of protests. Notwithstanding, Federal and State statute has already been broken, the DOJ seems not to care and Glenn Younkin is failing a test currently. Not known test, I'll call it a pop quiz, he has gotten a zero.
floridays
Well-Known Member
I thought Gen. Marshall had been revived, I eclair.
I love you fred, not in a biblical sense,
you knew that though
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Every Senate Democrat but one, just voted to legalize abortion up until the moment before birth.
Similar threads
- traveler
- The Archives