!Retired!
Well-Known Member
LOL.....that pisses MFE off more than anything.He was found to be not guilty of anything. That's what he did wrong.
Bottom line is, he was not convicted of anything. There would be a LOOOOOONG list of people to pay off to cover something up.....cops, witnesses, news reporters from every newspaper in the region, etc. If you miss just ONE person, you're screwed. Not that I would know any of this 1st hand.Just being logical. Let's see....Fred gets indicted for forging his sister's signatures on 1-31-75. At midnight, he hits and kills a 54 year-old pedestrian with his car, yet keeps on driving. "Luckily", the event is witnessed by an off-duty police officer. If I were Lt. Columbo. I'd probably check the bars to see of Fred had been drinking. Then, I'd check the bank account of the police officer to see if his testimony was coerced. Since it was hit and run, did Fred get caught the next morning (time to get sober) or just after the accident? Inquiring minds want to know.
While we're at it, what about the car accident when Fred was a Yale freshman? "No determination" for the cause. Could it have been that someone "forgot" to adminster a breath or blood test because Fred was the son of a big shot? 2 people dead, and none of it is Fred's fault?
My guess is that all of this has been cleansed from the records.
Look....I'm not a fan of Fred S. But, when someone starts throwing around accusations and insinuations, all I ask for is the proof, to which you always backpedal. Your response is usually 'Just Google it'. I posted something (reversal of the award), you asked for proof, I provided it.....see how simple? I see you're very good at drawing attention to yourself. But, at least post SOME kind of proof with the accusations.