rod
Retired 23 years
may as well

may as well
The piece on NBC was obviously a hit piece sponsored by some “friend” of NBC or one of its producers.
1). It was 100% focused on UPS vs the over 1,000,000 vehicles of this type that are on the road today. There was no objective reporting to call out a nationwide “problem” with the type of vehicle.
2). In typical “labor” fashion, the hit piece states “UPS made over $5 billion in profit last year. Surely they can afford to........(fill in the blank of one groups demands.)” How many of these type of vehicles does GE - parent of NBC - own without A/C?
3). NBC interviewed a former Obama era OSHA or labor secretary. If this person was that passionate about the cause, where was he during the 8 years of Obama administration? Why didn’t NBC interview any Teamster officials or industry experts?
4). NBC dramatizes the reporting of 107 UPS “employee” heat related injuries requiring medical attention since 2015. They failed to report this in perspective. While no injuries are desired , 107 injuries across four years of 99,000 drivers dispatched on an average day, is hardly a material number of injuries. Even if the injuries occurred in the 64 operating days between July aug and sept, that’s 107 injuries in 25 million driver days. (99k x 64 x 4). Again, not trying to minimize the impact of an injury to any one individual.
5). The drivers are represented by the Teamsters. Where was the interview with their negotiating teams? Assuming the teamsters put this up at every negotiation, what was taken off the table in exchange for taking A/C off the table?
Shame on NBC for it biased and lazy hit piece vs real investigative journalism.
What happens when it's a very rural route where the nearest bathroom is 50 miles away?
A/C would definitely work the small shot of cold air you get from business's does wonders, the same would be in the pkg car would make work more bearable and more productive, Ups's response is as much b.s. as ohhh the volume came in heavier than expected.Air conditioning wouldn't work and most package cars you turn on the package car 125 times a day. It's bound to break. I'm lucky I use the same package car every day and I'd rather be using it then seeing it in the shop getting the AC fixed
We’ll see.UPS will never install A/C in package cars
I agree, but then again, we said the same thing about power steering.UPS will never install A/C in package cars
Agreed.A/C would definitely work the small shot of cold air you get from business's does wonders, the same would be in the pkg car would make work more bearable and more productive, Ups's response is as much b.s. as ohhh the volume came in heavier than expected.
The issue is clear. UPS putting profits and money ahead of workers health and safety.UPS talking about AC being "ineffective" in pkg cars, but don't realize the half-broken fans they got in the unload barely reach 2ft in the trailer. Talk about ineffective. If it cuts into their profits, it's considered ineffective.
Good one!The piece on NBC was obviously a hit piece sponsored by some “friend” of NBC or one of its producers.
1). It was 100% focused on UPS vs the over 1,000,000 vehicles of this type that are on the road today. There was no objective reporting to call out a nationwide “problem” with the type of vehicle.
2). In typical “labor” fashion, the hit piece states “UPS made over $5 billion in profit last year. Surely they can afford to........(fill in the blank of one groups demands.)” How many of these type of vehicles does GE - parent of NBC - own without A/C?
3). NBC interviewed a former Obama era OSHA or labor secretary. If this person was that passionate about the cause, where was he during the 8 years of Obama administration? Why didn’t NBC interview any Teamster officials or industry experts?
4). NBC dramatizes the reporting of 107 UPS “employee” heat related injuries requiring medical attention since 2015. They failed to report this in perspective. While no injuries are desired , 107 injuries across four years of 99,000 drivers dispatched on an average day, is hardly a material number of injuries. Even if the injuries occurred in the 64 operating days between July aug and sept, that’s 107 injuries in 25 million driver days. (99k x 64 x 4). Again, not trying to minimize the impact of an injury to any one individual.
5). The drivers are represented by the Teamsters. Where was the interview with their negotiating teams? Assuming the teamsters put this up at every negotiation, what was taken off the table in exchange for taking A/C off the table?
Shame on NBC for it biased and lazy hit piece vs real investigative journalism.
The issue is clear. UPS putting profits and money ahead of workers health and safety.
Nothing new here.. I worked there 38 years. It hasn't changed and never will.The issue is clear. UPS putting profits and money ahead of workers health and safety.
UPS will never install A/C in package cars
We’ll see.
I agree, but then again, we said the same thing about power steering.
How you do your business with integrity is the only answer that shareholders want.And that will never change. Must answer to shareholders first & foremost.
I believe in positive change not defeatism.Nothing new here.. I worked there 38 years. It hasn't changed and never will.
I think the Teamsters should go to war on this one.They certainly wouldn't pay to retro-fit the entire pkg car fleet.
Look at those automatic bulk head door opening things they installed on older trucks.
There were 3 versions of that system.... UPS went with the cheapest one.
The only way it "could" possibly happen is through negotiations in the next contract.
And then, it would be only on newly manufactured trucks.
I don't see it being a priority.... or even a reality.
I think the Teamsters should go to war on this one.
Very few support Unionism.
Heck most don’t even vote.
Why wouldn't it work? Stupid excuse.
They make them low profile and lots of price points and options.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00SQ2GEJA/ref=psdcmw_3147787011_t1_B00HJQ86UO