i don't' really care what she does afterwards. She is entitled to her day in court in this wonderful country we live in.Move on, eh? Shall we both make predictions about how that’ll go?
is there some reason you object to people having their day in court?
Come on now, only Democrats are allowed to question the legitimacy of elections. With Republicans it's THE BIG LIE, but with Democrats it's whatever they throw against the wall to see what sticks.
Do you think Arizona's election was handled well? You seem to dodge that question every time I ask it.
Hobbs seems to be afraid of going to court. She is fighting the subpoenas that the judge previously ruled against her motion to quash.I guess we’ll see whether Kari Lake has evidence that it wasn’t.
This seems to be all there is:
Arizona judge rules two of Kari Lake's election challenge claims can go to trial | Fox News
Kari Lake took to Twitter after the Arizona judge's ruling on her election lawsuit, writing: 'This is far from over'www.foxnews.com
“The two counts that Judge Thompson ruled can go to trial involve printers malfunctioning on Election Day and ballot chain of custody. Lake claimed printers that malfunctioned were not certified and had "vulnerabilities" that made them "susceptible to hacking." She also claimed the printers malfunctioned because of "intentional action."
Judge Thompson said Lake must prove at trial that someone interfered with the printers in violation of Arizona law, that the interference caused her to lose votes and that those lost votes affected the outcome of the election.”
So you're not aware of the election day problems? This lawsuit is really the first you're hearing about the printer problems?I guess we’ll see whether Kari Lake has evidence that it wasn’t.
This seems to be all there is:
Arizona judge rules two of Kari Lake's election challenge claims can go to trial | Fox News
Kari Lake took to Twitter after the Arizona judge's ruling on her election lawsuit, writing: 'This is far from over'
“The two counts that Judge Thompson ruled can go to trial involve printers malfunctioning on Election Day and ballot chain of custody. Lake claimed printers that malfunctioned were not certified and had "vulnerabilities" that made them "susceptible to hacking." She also claimed the printers malfunctioned because of "intentional action."
Judge Thompson said Lake must prove at trial that someone interfered with the printers in violation of Arizona law, that the interference caused her to lose votes and that those lost votes affected the outcome of the election.”
thats going to be a workload of proving
as the person responsible for the states elections she is subject to unwanted attention as to how she managed the processes.
she's fortunate to have such a dedicated fan club getting her message out.
If you wish to look at it that way, i will allow it
