Adam Schiff

[BrownArmy]

He's "attacking" the greatest president ever! And Trump called him Little Adam Schi**, and FOX doesn't like him either! So, OBVIOUSLY Schiff is a Communistical, Socialist, Pinko hack, who is trying to NOT make America great again!

I love how former House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy criticizes the Democrats for all of their investigations when he and his fellow Republicans led numerous investigations, all politically motivated, and which went nowhere.

Benghazi (mission accomplished to knock down Hillary's poll numbers), Fast and Furious, the emails. All a huge waste, except for boosting Trump's chances.

Can’t believe McCarthy actually said that out loud, in earshot of journalists.

The hypocrisy is galling.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Can’t believe McCarthy actually said that out loud, in earshot of journalists.

The hypocrisy is galling.

You didn't know he is a politician?
SMH

 

[vantexan]

Can’t believe McCarthy actually said that out loud, in earshot of journalists.

The hypocrisy is galling.

Almost as bad as Dems defending Hillary, amirite?

 

[BrownArmy]

Almost as bad as Dems defending Hillary, amirite?

No, you’re not correct.

You’re crying like a B because you think the Mueller Investigation is political and you think it’s taking too long.

Wrong.

The Benghazi investigation went on for five years, with literally zero to show, and it was a political hit-job, which McCarthy admitted to.

In contrast:

The Mueller investigation has been on for two years, and people are going to jail.

Don’t forget, Mueller isn’t tasked with investigating Trump, he’s tasked with discerning the Russian involvement in the 2016 election.

The problem is, he keeps finding Trumps’ associates all over the place.

So you tell me, which ones ‘political’?

Gosh you’re a rube.

 

[vantexan]

No, you’re not correct.

You’re crying like a B because you think the Mueller Investigation is political and you think it’s taking too long.

Wrong.

The Benghazi investigation went on for five years, with literally zero to show, and it was a political hit-job, which McCarthy admitted to.

In contrast:

The Mueller investigation has been on for two years, and people are going to jail.

Don’t forget, Mueller isn’t tasked with investigating Trump, he’s tasked with discerning the Russian involvement in the 2016 election.

The problem is, he keeps finding Trumps’ associates all over the place.

So you tell me, which ones ‘political’?

Gosh you’re a rube.

Tell me again which of Trump's associates who are going to jail was charged with colluding with Russians to influence the 2016 election?

And to quote Hillary when she angrily dismissed Americans dying in Benghazi: "At this point what difference does it make?"

 

[newfie]

He's "attacking" the greatest president ever! And Trump called him Little Adam Schi**, and FOX doesn't like him either! So, OBVIOUSLY Schiff is a Communistical, Socialist, Pinko hack, who is trying to NOT make America great again!
.

Agreed

 

[BrownArmy]

Tell me again which of Trump's associates who are going to jail was charged with colluding with Russians to influence the 2016 election?

And to quote Hillary when she angrily dismissed Americans dying in Benghazi: "At this point what difference does it make?"

Actually my post was about Benghazi.

You liked it back then, when the full force of the Gubernment was attacking someone you didn't like (five year investigation into Benghazi).

This time, you're crying like a BTCH because you're awful upset that there are currently seventeen investigations into Trump, his children, his business dealings, on and on and on.

It took Howdy-Doody Trey Gowdy six years to find...nothing.

It's taken Mueller two years to indict everyone he's found, and he's not even tasked with looking at Trump.

What's your problem?

Mueller is looking at Russian interference, and he keeps indicting Trump associates.

Huh.

 

[vantexan]

Actually my post was about Benghazi.

You liked it back then, when the full force of the Gubernment was attacking someone you didn't like (five year investigation into Benghazi).

This time, you're crying like a BTCH because you're awful upset that there are currently seventeen investigations into Trump, his children, his business dealings, on and on and on.

It took Howdy-Doody Trey Gowdy six years to find...nothing.

It's taken Mueller two years to indict everyone he's found, and he's not even tasked with looking at Trump.

What's your problem?

Mueller is looking at Russian interference, and he keeps indicting Trump associates.

Huh.

If you kept up with it, and I'm sure you don't, you'd know that elements in the DOJ and FBI have fought releasing documents every step of the way during all that time. As well as the State Dept with Clinton. That allows low info voters such as yourself to snort and carry on as if nothing ever happened. How can it be, no arrests, no convictions, nothing to see here folks! But I can sense your frustration because you were certain that the Dems were going to win the House and the Senate. Then you could impeach Trump and make it stick! And Mueller has yet to indict one American for Russian interference. Everything is about breaking people to get them to talk. Flynn's conviction was B.S. but y'all talk about him like he helped Lee Harvey. That's Oswald if you don't know, being a low info voter and all.

 

[BrownArmy]

If you kept up with it, and I'm sure you don't, you'd know that elements in the DOJ and FBI have fought releasing documents every step of the way during all that time. As well as the State Dept with Clinton. That allows low info voters such as yourself to snort and carry on as if nothing ever happened. How can it be, no arrests, no convictions, nothing to see here folks! But I can sense your frustration because you were certain that the Dems were going to win the House and the Senate. Then you could impeach Trump and make it stick! And Mueller has yet to indict one American for Russian interference. Everything is about breaking people to get them to talk. Flynn's conviction was B.S. but y'all talk about him like he helped Lee Harvey. That's Oswald if you don't know, being a low info voter and all.

Man, I have no idea where to start with all that nonsense.

You do you.

Let's call a truce - I'll stick with verifiable facts, and I'll show them to you, and in return, you'll dismiss them and say bad things about me.

LOLOLOL

Dude, get a better news source, or get better about vetting whatever news sources you enjoy.

Wow.

I go to work at UPS, and you're just like a guy I know...

Complete Fkg nutjob...

Facts are irrelevant, and it seems, just an impediment for Dear Leaders' Implementation of 'His Truth'.

Sound Familiar?

Carry on.

 

[bbsam]

And to quote Hillary when she angrily dismissed Americans dying in Benghazi: "At this point what difference does it make?"

That did not happen and you know it.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...t-hillary-clintons-what-difference-does-it-m/

 

[Old Man Jingles]

And to quote Hillary when she angrily dismissed Americans dying in Benghazi: "At this point what difference does it make?"

That did not happen and you know it.

Actually it did when she was being questioned by Senators during a Senate committee hearing in January 2013.


"Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night and decided they’d go kill some Americans," Clinton said. "What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?"

But what was the context?

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis: No, again, we were misled that there were supposedly protests and that something sprang out of that -- an assault sprang out of that -- and that was easily ascertained that that was not the fact, and the American people could have known that within days and they didn’t know that.

Clinton: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The IC has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But you know, to be clear, it is, from my perspective, less important today looking backwards as to why these militants decided they did it than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we’ll figure out what was going on in the meantime.

Johnson: OK. Thank you, Madame Secretary.

 

[bbsam]

Actually it did when she was being questioned by Senators during a Senate committee hearing in January 2013.

"Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night and decided they’d go kill some Americans," Clinton said. "What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?"

But what was the context?

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis: No, again, we were misled that there were supposedly protests and that something sprang out of that -- an assault sprang out of that -- and that was easily ascertained that that was not the fact, and the American people could have known that within days and they didn’t know that.

Clinton: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The IC has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But you know, to be clear, it is, from my perspective, less important today looking backwards as to why these militants decided they did it than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we’ll figure out what was going on in the meantime.

Johnson: OK. Thank you, Madame Secretary.

And you believe that is angrily dismissing Americans dying?

 

[Old Man Jingles]

And you believe that is angrily dismissing Americans dying?

The word 'debatable' is questionable but certainly in play when doofuses are pretending they are political pundits.

.
.
.​

 

[bbsam]

The word 'debatable' is questionable but certainly in play when doofuses are pretending they are political pundits.

.
.
.​

It doesn’t take a political pundit to read for context.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

It doesn’t take a political pundit to read for context.

Good doofuses on each side!

 

[vantexan]

Man, I have no idea where to start with all that nonsense.

You do you.

Let's call a truce - I'll stick with verifiable facts, and I'll show them to you, and in return, you'll dismiss them and say bad things about me.

LOLOLOL

Dude, get a better news source, or get better about vetting whatever news sources you enjoy.

Wow.

I go to work at UPS, and you're just like a guy I know...

Complete Fkg nutjob...

Facts are irrelevant, and it seems, just an impediment for Dear Leaders' Implementation of 'His Truth'.

Sound Familiar?

Carry on.

So, a lot of talk but as of yet you haven't produced one American indicted for colluding with Russians? But you have called me a lot of names, so there's that. I hope you do stick to the facts and hopefully you'll eventually produce some. Until then right back atcha!

 

[vantexan]

That did not happen and you know it.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...t-hillary-clintons-what-difference-does-it-m/

I saw it when it happened.

 

[vantexan]

And you believe that is angrily dismissing Americans dying?

If you had seen the hearing her statement wasn't made in a civil tone. She didn't like being questioned about her handling of the matter and she half yelled, half snarled it. Probably on YouTube if anyone is interested.

 

[vantexan]

The word 'debatable' is questionable but certainly in play when doofuses are pretending they are political pundits.

.
.
.​

Yes Rat if we were box jockeys all our lives our opinions don't matter. Never mind that we've followed politics closely for 30 years, it's obviously too complicated for our feeble minds. With the exception of a rare few, such as yourself, blessed with keen insight. Wah, lookey thar, our bettuhs are discussin' high and mighty things agin! We's bettuh makes ourselves scarce before we's hurts our brains!

 

[newfie]

He has two degrees including a jd from Stanford and Harvard.....So before you question his intelligence show us what you've got that stacks up against it.