newfie
Well-Known Member
For the courts to decide not Adam schiffExecutive Privilege doesn't apply. Sorry. Trump doesn't get his own special laws to protect him.
For the courts to decide not Adam schiffExecutive Privilege doesn't apply. Sorry. Trump doesn't get his own special laws to protect him.
No surprise...2 stooges she picked....
Pelosi announces House impeachment managers to prosecute case against Trump
For the courts to decide not Adam schiff
yeah, the House portion was so fairIt doesn't matter who she picked. McConnell has already decided Trump is innocent...before the trial. Actively working with Team Trump to get Orange Man off the hook as quickly as possible.
In other words, completely rigged, with no witnesses because Republican won't allow them. Again, Trump was allowed to have witnesses at the impeachment hearings, but they were barred from testifying.
The only witnesses the GOP wanted were The Bidens, which wasn't going to happen.
yeah, the House portion was so fair
Nope, they were denied calling witnesses by Schiff and Nadler.Trump could have called whomever his minions wanted, except the Bidens, who were cleared long ago.
The Senate is just a free pass for a corrupt man.
The House Majority made up its own rules.
Only seems fair that the Senate Majority is allowed to do the same.
Republicans called witnesses.Nope, they were denied calling witnesses by Schiff and Nadler.
Really? Who, other than Jonathan Turley?Republicans called witnesses.
Why do you hate fairness?Right. Clear Trump ASAP with no witnesses.
Kurt Volker and Tim Morrison were requested by Republicans. You might be confused because their testimony was also damning of the President and his corrupt actions.Really? Who, other than Jonathan Turley?
Beyond Turley, who was one of the four Constitutional scholars called to give their opinion, there weren't any other witnesses allowed. That in spite being told by Schiff and Nadler that the Republicans would get their turn. Didn't happen.Kurt Volker and Tim Morrison were requested by Republicans. You might be confused because their testimony was also damning of the President and his corrupt actions.
I literally just named 2 witnesses that were requested by republicans.Beyond Turley, who was one of the four Constitutional scholars called to give their opinion, there weren't any other witnesses allowed. That in spite being told by Schiff and Nadler that the Republicans would get their turn. Didn't happen.
Beyond Turley, who was one of the four Constitutional scholars called to give their opinion, there weren't any other witnesses allowed. That in spite being told by Schiff and Nadler that the Republicans would get their turn. Didn't happen.
Why do you hate fairness?
So they can maintain the talking point of not hearing from people with direct knowledge of what the President said. Why doesn’t Trump testify? Should be easy to talk about a perfect phone call.Why didn't the Republicans want to call Pompeo, Bolton, or Mulvaney?