MrFedEx
Engorged Member
Actually if you'd been paying attention, those numbers are better than the national average.
In that case, we all need to be driving armored cars to protect ourselves.
Actually if you'd been paying attention, those numbers are better than the national average.
Yes. A lot of bad drivers out there.In that case, we all need to be driving armored cars to protect ourselves.
Well considering this report, I wouldn't be surprised at all.I would be surprised if that did not make its way into the data.
Need me to work Google for you? Fmcsa score isn't classified, nor is it difficult to find. Here's the quick breakdown since typing fmcsa into google is beyond your capability.You mean between your hat size and your IQ? Oh, that's right, they're the same. Is providing a link to these numbers a little too advanced for you?
I'll I see is Alyssa Milano. That's a good thing.
Don't know where you got that quote, but is there any reason to believe miscoding and recording wrong DOT numbers would only happen to FedEx Ground incidents?"The FMCSA says there are many reasons why these crashes were not included in FedEx Ground’s safety record. They cite possible mistakes such as miscoding the crash reports, recording the wrong DOT numbers or flat out failing to report at all."
Well so much for being better than the national averages. @bbsam
Like I said Ground's scores are nothing to be proud of.
Right here.Don't know where you got that quote, but is there any reason to believe miscoding and recording wrong DOT numbers would only happen to FedEx Ground incidents?
Ground's hazmat score is better than Express by the way.
Yes. A lot of bad drivers out there.
"The FMCSA says there are many reasons why these crashes were not included in FedEx Ground’s safety record. They cite possible mistakes such as miscoding the crash reports, recording the wrong DOT numbers or flat out failing to report at all."
Well so much for being better than the national averages. @bbsam
Like I said Ground's scores are nothing to be proud of.
"The agency says it’s unclear whether the two California accidents or the 13 others across the country would significantly affect FedEx Ground’s safety score"
Do you have problems deciding which number is bigger?"The FMCSA says there are many reasons why these crashes were not included in FedEx Ground’s safety record. They cite possible mistakes such as miscoding the crash reports, recording the wrong DOT numbers or flat out failing to report at all."
Well so much for being better than the national averages. @bbsam
Like I said Ground's scores are nothing to be proud of.
Not at all. But do you?Do you have problems deciding which number is bigger?
No. I think the numbers suck. I think the whole scoring system sucks. Garbage in/Garbage out.Not at all. But do you?
You're totally blind to the fact that Ground's scores suck.
Just because you have a chunk of change invested in your (cough) own business doesn't make the situation any better.
"The agency says it’s unclear whether the two California accidents or the 13 others across the country would significantly affect FedEx Ground’s safety score"
They also say they weren't reported due to officers failing to properly document crashes. So there's no reason to believe that would happen with only FedEx Ground crashes. It would happen with the same frequency as every other carrier. This would not affect Ground's standing compared to national averages.
But it's not an X "cover up". There's no conspiracy, just a flawed system. There's no reason to believe the numbers for Express or UPS are any more accurate.That's two that they actually know about. This would lead one to surmise there are probably others.
But it's not an X "cover up". There's no conspiracy, just a flawed system. There's no reason to believe the numbers for Express or UPS are any more accurate.
Looks like a flawed system who's data can't be trusted for any company. You simply can't take numbers in a vaccuum. They don't make sense. They have to be able to be compared and contrasted as I tried to point out in posting Ground's compared to the national average. But if those numbers are significantly flawed, none of it really means anything.Didn't say that there was, but it looks like a flawed system is giving Ground scores they don't deserve, doesn't it?
No more or less than any other carrier. You guys are really grasping at straws here.Didn't say that there was, but it looks like a flawed system is giving Ground scores they don't deserve, doesn't it?
No more or less than any other carrier. You guys are really grasping at straws here.