climate catastrophe

rickyb

Well-Known Member
"The ring"? Like the movie where the girl comes out of the tv screen? Or like "my precious"? Either way, I'm glad to see you branching out in your movie references.

That does make sense. Except it doesn't have anything to do with the post you responded to. I'm glad your guys are moving away from that socialism nonsense and more towards a representative republic.

Although, decentralized power isn't very effective at dealing with existential threats, like global warming. How do your guys reconcile their favoring decentralized power with the need for coordinated efforts to deal with large scale threats?
I don't recall. Cooperation?

U don't understand the definition of socialism

Yes it makes sense
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
"The ring"? Like the movie where the girl comes out of the tv screen? Or like "my precious"? Either way, I'm glad to see you branching out in your movie references.

That does make sense. Except it doesn't have anything to do with the post you responded to. I'm glad your guys are moving away from that socialism nonsense and more towards a representative republic.

Although, decentralized power isn't very effective at dealing with existential threats, like global warming. How do your guys reconcile their favoring decentralized power with the need for coordinated efforts to deal with large scale threats?
Decentralized power like ppl protesting in the streets is the thing that will keep us below 1.5 celcius warming. Govts likely won't act rationally otherwise
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
I don't recall. Cooperation?

U don't understand the definition of Ricky's socialism

Yes it makes sense
Your Socialism has a micro-economic approach and application.

Everyone else's Socialism is based on a Macro-Economic approach with emphasis on National Centralized heavy-handed government.

That difference between your made-up Socialism and real-world Socialism is why I don't engage you on discussions of Socialism.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Your Socialism has a micro-economic approach and application.

Everyone else's Socialism is based on a Macro-Economic approach with emphasis on National Centralized heavy-handed government.

That difference between your made-up Socialism and real-world Socialism is why I don't engage you on discussions of Socialism.
if its undemocratic, is it really socialism? democracy im assuming should be highly participatory. i think you have associations with the word and that could be different from what it actually is.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
its over 40 degrees in vancouver canada now.

our leaders know the ship has crashed and is taking on water yet they are drunk at the wheel.
 

PT 4 Life

Most-Hated Member
im creating a new post on climate catastrophe because it more accurately reflects the environmental situation the elites have created for us

this is an unreal article about how power works (democracy) and stopping mass extinction:

Extinction Rebellion

If we do not shake off our lethargy, our anomie, and resist, our misery, despondency and feelings of helplessness will mount. We will become paralyzed. Resistance, especially given the bleakness before us, is about more than winning. It is about a life of meaning. It is about empowerment. It is a public declaration that we will no longer live according to the dominant lie. It is a message to the elites: YOU DO NOT OWN US. It is about defending our dignity, agency and self-respect. The more we free ourselves from the bondage of fear to throw up barriers along the forced march toward ecocide the more we will be enveloped by a strange kind of euphoria, one I often felt as a war correspondent documenting horrific suffering and atrocities to shame the killers. We obliterate despair in our acts of defiance, even if our victories are Pyrrhic. We reach out to those around us. Courage is contagious. It is the spark that ignites mass revolt. And we should, even if we fail, at least choose how we will die. Resistance is the only action left that will allow us to remain psychologically whole. And it is the only action left that has any hope of halting the wholesale extinction of the human race, not to mention most other species.

There’s a fundamental difference between breaking the law and not breaking the law,” he went on. “It’s a binary difference. When you break the law, then you’re massively more effective in terms of material and psychological influence as well as media interest. The more dramatic the civil disobedience, the better. It’s a numbers game. You want people blocking the streets, but you need ten, twenty, thirty thousand. You don’t need 3 million. You need enough for the state to have to decide whether to use repression on a mass scale or invite you into the room. The gambit, of course, particularly in the U.K., is that the state is weak. It’s been hollowed out by neoliberalism. They’re going to find themselves overwhelmed. We will get in the room.”

Do we allow these people to continue blocking the center of a global city, or do we arrest thousands of people?’ If they opt for arresting thousands of people, lots of things are going to happen. They will be overwhelmed. The police force in the U.K. is underfunded, like most of the public sector. There’s massive disaffection amongst the police. I won’t be surprised if they form a union and say, ‘We’re not doing this anymore.’ I’ve been arrested 10, 12 times in the last two years. Every time, police come up to me going, ‘Keep it up, mate. What you’re doing is great.’ We’re disciplined, nonviolent people. They’re not going to get pissed off at us. They also know it’s over.

“You’re basically holding the economy of a city to ransom,” he said of the shutdowns. “It’s the same dynamic as a labor strike. You want to get into the room and have a negotiation. Extinction Rebellion hasn’t quite decided what that negotiation is going to be. We’ve got three demands—the government tells the truth, the carbon emissions go to zero by 2025, which is a proxy for transformation of the economy and the society, and we have a national assembly which will sort out what the British people want to do about it.

We simply cannot maintain these levels of consumption. They haven’t reckoned with that. One of the main reasons the climate debate has not gotten into a serious mode over the last 30 years is because people who are in charge of informing the public are terrified of telling the public that they can’t have the high consumer lifestyle anymore. It’s a taboo. But like any addiction, there comes a moment of truth. We’re there now.”

great post.
 

zubenelgenubi

I'm a star
1625117584003.png
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Justin McElroy


@j_mcelroy
·
5h

Over the weekend, B.C. passed 500,000 hectares burned this wildfire season. It's the third time in five years we've passed the half million mark. Prior to 2017, it had happened once in the province's recorded history.
 
Top