MrFedEx
Engorged Member
Figured as much. Gonna file that one under hearsay along with the executive jet theory BS.
Can you read? FedEx settles, and settlements are not public record. You can Google lawsuits all day long and you'll get plenty.
Figured as much. Gonna file that one under hearsay along with the executive jet theory BS.
So no source?
Right. Nobody at FedEx has ever been terminated on false premises. The courts say otherwise.
Tool.
Source?
So no source?
How can you call the jet thing a theory? We heard it here from a guy who heard it from a guy who heard it from a guy after his buddy hypothesized the idea.Figured as much. Gonna file that one under hearsay along with the executive jet theory BS.
What about sources? Use any search engine you like and you'll get case after case.
Would you like to debate the ratio of normal terminations:terminations via false pretenses?
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, insulting, sexually-oriented or any material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned from this site. The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions.
Read more: http://www.browncafe.com/community/help/terms#ixzz3UbYnx3r1
Bingo! It's "I personally know of eighty gazillion instances, none of which I can/will document. Besides, none of them are traceable." and so on and so on.
What's so hard about googling a FedEx lawsuit?It's his job to source your allegation?
That's a new one.
I think that was just California.I think everyone on this forum got a payout about 3 yrs. ago after some sort of litigation. Or, maybe it was just CA?
There's been more than one in California. There's been at least 4 that I can remember.I think that was just California.
Even though everyone else deserves a payout too.
I've found that getting an attorney makes almost all the difference. Bet things change pretty quick. And if all else fails, write a book. I'm sure he has plenty of interesting chapters to write about, with he being an SM.No they had nothing on him...no falsification, no integrity issues, etc... I'm not looking sympathy. I was just curious to see if anyone thought it was worth fighting for? I know it's been a blessing.
It was just his boss said one thing and then the call with the head of HR from Pittsburg had a different reason that didn't make sense & they had no idea when they were told he won the award for the best audit. But everyone in Fedex knows they aren't going to admit wrong doing. They will back company employees first wrong or not. I personally think it upset his boss when he applied for another senior manager job out of the district he was in. I personally think it was retaliation for wanting out of that district because it was crap. My husband bleed purple. He loved his job stress or not....No one from any of the other districts he worked in can believe he was let go. They would take him in a heart beat if they could. I think most people just want a REAL and FAIR reason to terminate after 17 years with a company. Mind you there were other employees who did a crap job and were offered demotions. He wasn't even told or given reason to believe he was about to be let go. It just doesn't make sense.
As usual, here you are in denial mode. You know the truth, and that's why you're here...to obfuscate it.
What's so hard about googling a FedEx lawsuit?
I've found that getting an attorney makes almost all the difference. Bet things change pretty quick. And if all else fails, write a book. I'm sure he has plenty of interesting chapters to write about, with he being an SM.
Getting a lawyer seems to be the de facto answer to every question presented here...
Good defense. You are often offensive in violation of the TOS. That's kinda what you do here. Present weak arguments and then make personal attacks when people disagree. Your use of "tool" was clearly meant to be offensive and a personal attack.First. The word "tool" doesn't violate this site's TOS. Please see my post in Current Events titled " Scott Walker: Tool". Sorry that you're a sensitive tool, but let's discuss exactly what a tool is, OK? Just for clarification, I'm not accusing you of being Fred's hammer or screwdriver...you're more like a toilet plunger. For me, a tool is someone who is used as an operative by a third party to advance said party's agenda. Uh, you would appear to fit that definition, as would your endless posts defending FedEx. It's very clear your position at FedEx requires you to advance the company line as directed by your superior(s). Therefore, you are...a tool.
And yes, getting a lawyer is always sound advice when dealing with FDX.
Good defense. You are often offensive in violation of the TOS. That's kinda what you do here. Present weak arguments and then make personal attacks when people disagree. Your use of "tool" was clearly meant to be offensive and a personal attack.