542thruNthru
Well-Known Member
Sound does not start working till 14:30. I don't know why and I hope they fix it.
Debates
- Thread starter 542thruNthru
- Start date
542thruNthru
Well-Known Member
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
It was a good debate. Sean is a trustee for my pension fund. I’m not sure about him. I give Steve the edge in this one.
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Thanks for posting it
Whither
Scofflaw
The video on the official IBT facebook page seems to be complete and with full audio. Skip to about 11 minutes in, that's when the action starts.
542thruNthru
Well-Known Member
Here is the full debate with comments on side.
Without comments
Without comments
Big Rigger
Well-Known Member
The suspension issue with Sean was years ago. He took responsibility for what he said.
The demeaning and disrespectful "token" comment by Vairma was recent and he defended it until the moderator called him out on it. There's no person who never makes a mistake so owning up to the issue is the key. One did and one didn't. Sean won that one.
Vairma looks and sounds like Hoff a 2.0 and members want someone aggressive like Sean, especially with the stress companies are putting on the workforce for the last 17 months. That's my opinion.
I'm sure they both have both great slate members and some weaker so I'm not dissing either slate according to what I just watched but as for my impression I'd vote for Sean. You can't lift yourself up by trying to degrade others and the "token" comment by Vairma was racist, degrading, and it was evident he was standing by it until he was called out by the moderator. That is disingenuous and tells me a bit about his hidden character. To me it looks like more Hoff a Jr status quo. If you say it, own it.
The demeaning and disrespectful "token" comment by Vairma was recent and he defended it until the moderator called him out on it. There's no person who never makes a mistake so owning up to the issue is the key. One did and one didn't. Sean won that one.
Vairma looks and sounds like Hoff a 2.0 and members want someone aggressive like Sean, especially with the stress companies are putting on the workforce for the last 17 months. That's my opinion.
I'm sure they both have both great slate members and some weaker so I'm not dissing either slate according to what I just watched but as for my impression I'd vote for Sean. You can't lift yourself up by trying to degrade others and the "token" comment by Vairma was racist, degrading, and it was evident he was standing by it until he was called out by the moderator. That is disingenuous and tells me a bit about his hidden character. To me it looks like more Hoff a Jr status quo. If you say it, own it.
Boston25
Well-Known Member
I agree 100%
EverybodyLovesMike
No, my name isnt mike
I was referring to legalization of cannabis
EverybodyLovesMike
No, my name isnt mike
what a great way to let the company know what you like to do on your free time. File a grievance? Sure. Take a drug test while you're at it!
burrheadd
KING Of GIFS
Not how it works
Why not educate yourself
542thruNthru
Well-Known Member
I don't do drugs. I'd love for them to send me for a fit for duty.
EverybodyLovesMike
No, my name isnt mike
Watch your drinks/food. If someone wants you gone, they can put THC oil (even micro amounts) in your drinks and say they saw you smoking a joint at lunch or something. You would never know.
542thruNthru
Well-Known Member
They want me gone that bad they could do all sorts of things.
burrheadd
KING Of GIFS
Is this how you live your life?
Scared to death of everything
Both did very well with the soft easy questions asked of them..I think either one would do a great job as president......The entire slate of each person should be considered and perhaps get both slates up for a debate so members could see how they conduct themselves......There are more similarities between the two candidates than differences and you cant really go far wrong with either...
Based on your previous posts, you sound like you are or used to be management.
The fact that you are for either candidate is probably the most terrifying endorsement I can think of.
used to be.......I was a teamster and a steward for some time prior......I have and never have had any issue with teamsters.....they do a difficult job in difficult circumstances and do them well....problems are due to management ineptness.....certainly its managements responsibility to manage well....management must pay attention to the tone they set and follow thru.....lead from the front and people will follow.....leadership is not pushing, its pulling by example....and yes I was in the service a long time go.......
