El Paso Shootings

[MyTripisCut]

The police are under no obligation to protect the public. The guns they carry are to protect themselves.

“To protect and serve” ???

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Good thing majority rules, not bbsam rules.

No it doesn't lol.
Educate yourself fren.

 

[newfie]

No it wasn't. You're the one who jumped on his soap box and explained in detail the virtues how a long standing set of gun laws that have sought to keep weapons of war out the hands of the general population while opposing the passage of new and updated laws which might help to keep a weapon of war (AK47) from being used in this week's blood bath . And BTW the gun used at last night's Dayton massacre was reported to be a high capacity .223 Was it an AR we'll soon find out.

there pictures of the weapon already posted online.
your statement was incorrect and totally idiotic.

your following statement trying to save your initial stupidty does not save you from your stupidity.

its clear as fred pointed out there you're either off your meds or overdosing on them.

 

[over9five]

“To protect and serve” ???

Don't believe it. The courts have said many times police only have to protect those who are in custody. They can sit down, watch you being attacked and do nothing.

 

[Non sequitur]

It's green, no guns, and free healthcare!

 

[Jkloc420]

They shout white supremacist but they want to take tools away from you to protect yourself.

 

[Jkloc420]

I bet the indians wished they had guns when they were invaded by illegals

 

[vantexan]

I bet the indians wished they had guns when they were invaded by illegals

No worries, unscrupulous whites sold guns to them.

 

[Jkloc420]

No worries, unscrupulous whites sold guns to them.

i just find it funny we should have open arms to illegals but then shout we stole indian land and slaughtered them. That right there is a good point to stop illegal immigration

 

[AttackedHawk34]

 

[AttackedHawk34]

 

[bottomups]

Majority doesn’t rule. If it did we’d have universal background checks for all gun purchases.

...and legal Cannabis.

 

[bottomups]

the opioids crisis is worse then this

We live in an alcohol soaked society. Alcohol kills many more than opiates ever will. Why is alcohol not a Schedule 1 drug?
Schedule 1 (I) drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined by the federal government as drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.Schedule 1 (I) drugs are the most dangerous drugs of all the drug schedules with potentially severe psychological or physical dependence.

 

[Babagounj]

Time for all the state run mental help facilities to be reopened. ( many governors saw it as a cost saving line item to close them )

 

[bacha29]

there pictures of the weapon already posted online.
your statement was incorrect and totally idiotic.

your following statement trying to save your initial stupidty does not save you from your stupidity.

its clear as fred pointed out there you're either off your meds or overdosing on them.

You're the one who's grabbing at straws. You're all in favor of the gun laws that can better serve to protect you but are opposed to any proposed gun law that inconveniences you . You want it both ways. BTW The House passed a bill that requires a more stringent background check but Moscow Mitch won't let it come to the Senate floor.

 

[Babagounj]

You're the one who's grabbing at straws. You're all in favor of the gun laws that can better serve to protect you but are opposed to any proposed gun law that inconveniences you . You want it both ways. BTW The House passed a bill that requires a more stringent background check but Moscow Mitch won't let it come to the Senate floor.

Massachusetts already has some of the most restrictive rules in effect. Every day some one is caught with a gun that they shouldn't have. And the liberal judges set them free. You see this over & over again. Rules look great on paper, but useless in real life.

 

[allahuakbar]

Guy was one hell of a shot.

 

[It will be fine]

Massachusetts already has some of the most restrictive rules in effect. Every day some one is caught with a gun that they shouldn't have. And the liberal judges set them free. You see this over & over again. Rules look great on paper, but useless in real life.

I love the anarchy argument. It’s so stupid it borders on brain dead, but it’s always presented as a reasonable objection to gun laws.

 

[BrownArmy]

Massachusetts already has some of the most restrictive rules in effect. Every day some one is caught with a gun that they shouldn't have. And the liberal judges set them free. You see this over & over again. Rules look great on paper, but useless in real life.

So don’t worry, be happy.

Your argument seems to be that there’s literally nothing to be done about mass-shootings.

In which case, sit back and enjoy the ride.

When it impacts you or yours, be smug in your assurance that banning guns wouldn’t have helped (which is likely true).

Enjoy the new reality.

 

[oldngray]

7 people shot in West Side park: police

Typical weekend in Chicago. Didn't even make the news.