Good to hear that but here's a situation I saw too many times at Ground:We've got 50-something veterans who can get the job done way quicker/better than a lot of the new young couriers. The veterans have 5 stops made before the new guy has all the addresses put into his phone some mornings.
Running fast and speeding doesn't necessarily equate to being faster. Many veteran couriers can walk to every stop on their entire route and do it in less time than a new courier who runs, simply because they spend too much time spazzing about how many stops they have or whatever.
Ground contractor to 55 year old box ox: "You've done a good job for me all theses years but I have to let you go. It's not that you're doing less it's just that you can't seem to do any more not only when it comes to doing your own ever increasing daily route load but also your growing inability to do the route of the guy who happened to call off that day along with your own.
Dependable, long suffering contractor employed driver:.. " Ok, so if this is your way of rewarding loyalty then all I have to say is "hasta lavista, baby. I'm out of here as in right this very moment"....Starts walking out.
Contractor: "But,but wait. You can't go yet. You have to stay 3 more weeks to train the guy who is going to replace you because I don't have a manager and I drive a daily route myself".
Dependable, long suffering contractor employed driver: " You think so? Don't you remember? I am an "at will" employee and you've just told me that I've been
replaced. Therefore, training and bringing the replacement up to speed is a contractor problem that requires a contractor solution".
Believe me, I saw this situation plenty of times.