IN response to questions. I was a day one contradtor at a small rural terminal that was designated for closing twice in it's first 3 years of operation. I remained a SWA contractor till the end despite opportunities for additional routes. Why? Because if you were to give that driver what he is entitled to have and that is a family sustaining wage, a basic employer paid health care plan and something in the way of a pension you'll have a return on your moneyof about 6%. I can buy a utility stock that pays that much. MIght as well give the guy the route. To pay him less than that then all you have created is transitional employment. Just the job between jobs, something to tide them over until something better comes along. And you can't assume that there will always be someone to take over. If that truck sits there that morning then you are in default.With additional routes the risk/reward ratio is even more overshifted onto the side of risk.FX plainly admits that the business model has nothing to do with creating equity for contractors but rather to acquire trucking and labor a below average market cost for the purpose of maximizing returns. Proof of that is found in the fact that grounds revenues comprises on 21% of the corporations total revenues but accounts for 78% of it's total profits