Go away in Pa.

[MisplacedRailWorker]

@floridays let’s start drinking
@PT Car Washer thank you for your service I’m sure you did something
More than I can say

 

[bbsam]

Why do you insist on being a liar or are you just ignorant of fact?

From the opinion, first page of text

BIBAS, Circuit Judge. Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here. The Trump Presidential Campaign asserts that Pennsylvania’s 2020 election was unfair. But as lawyer Rudolph Giuliani stressed, the Campaign “doesn’t plead fraud.

Stay away from anything dealing with the law, or an opinion of a court, whether as a liar or an ignorant.
Consider this a strong rebuke, the type you like to claim Court's make.

So if he doesn’t plead fraud, what evidence does he bring of unfairness? Because it doesn’t seem that the court saw evidence of that either.

 

[newfie]

Not to mention that trump has the power and resources of the Executive branch of the US government and still can't prove any fraud.

using the executive branch to further his campaign efforts would be a big no no

 

[floridays]

@floridays if you want you can demean me, I was a scumbag in the reserves MOS 6969 * up

Not my job my friend, I don't demean someone that puts their ass on the line.
I don't roll like that.

 

[newfie]

So if he doesn’t plead fraud, what evidence does he bring of unfairness? Because it doesn’t seem that the court saw evidence of that either.

Multiple different types of violations of election law , different enforcement in democratic counties than republican counties

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

So if he doesn’t plead fraud, what evidence does he bring of unfairness? Because it doesn’t seem that the court saw evidence of that either.

Article 2 Section 1 clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States of America. And just for fun throw in section one of the 14th amendment.

 

[floridays]

So if he doesn’t plead fraud, what evidence does he bring of unfairness? Because it doesn’t seem that the court saw evidence of that either.

You, Me anyway, would offer the Constitutional and Statutory violations.
Those lead to the fraud. You need to let the court make their determination of whatever term they choose to use.
Just my opinion, I think I'm right and will stand by it.

 

[bbsam]

You, Me anyway, would offer the Constitutional and Statutory violations.
Those lead to the fraud. You need to let the court make their determination of whatever term they choose to use.
Just my opinion, I think I'm right and will stand by it.

So which ones did Rudy argue were violated and what evidence did he present?

 

[floridays]

Multiple different types of violations of election law , different enforcement in democratic counties than republican counties

Equal protection. 14th

My vote for the national election was disenfranchised by PA, and I have no standing.
No different than any illegal vote cast.

 

[bbsam]

Article 2 Section 1 clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States of America. And just for fun throw in section one of the 14th amendment.

Enlighten me. Or maybe enlighten Rudy and the courts.

 

[floridays]

So which ones did Rudy argue were violated and what evidence did he present?

I haven't read his pleading so I can't answer that.
Rudy is not the only one working in Pennsylvania.
I do know article 2 and the 14th have been raised simply from reading this state judges ruling.

Pennsylvania State Judge Upholds Halt To Certification, Finds Likelihood Mail-In Balloting Procedures Violate PA Constitution

UPDATE 11-28-2020 7 p.m.: Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismisses challenge to mail-in ballot procedures, vacates halt to certification.

legalinsurrection.com

 

[bacha29]

Article 2 Section 1 clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States of America. And just for fun throw in section one of the 14th amendment.

So do you have a juris degree? Passed a bar exam? Argued a constitutional law case in a state or federal court?

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

Enlighten me. Or maybe enlighten Rudy and the courts.

In regards to article 2, state legislatures have the sole authority to make election laws and the manner to choose electors. Unelected partisan bureaucrats have no constitutional right to change those laws in the middle of an election under the guise of public health or any other BS they come up with.

In regards to the 14th amendment, the equal protection clause has clearly been widely violated in multiple instances.

Any other questions?

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

So do you have a juris degree? Passed a bar exam? Argued a constitutional law case in a state or federal court?

Just take notes and wait until Monday when Rachel Maddow gives you your talking points lady.

 

[bbsam]

Equal protection. 14th

My vote for the national election was disenfranchised by PA, and I have no standing.
No different than any illegal vote cast.

That sounds like what people say when they vote for the person who gets the most votes loses because of the electoral college system.
Are you suggesting that the electoral college fundamentally disenfranchises voters?

 

[floridays]

Article 2 Section 1 clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States of America. And just for fun throw in section one of the 14th amendment.

Not just for fun, if given a hearing I'd beat them to death with it.

 

[floridays]

That sounds like what people say when they vote for the person who gets the most votes loses because of the electoral college system.
Are you suggesting that the electoral college fundamentally disenfranchises voters?

Not at all, there is no relation.
The people that make that argument are uneducated on one of the basic tenets that allowed for the forming of our Union.

 

[floridays]

So do you have a juris degree? Passed a bar exam? Argued a constitutional law case in a state or federal court?

You're back for more I see butter knife.
I'm in a bar, does that count.

 

[bacha29]

I haven't read his pleading so I can't answer that.
Rudy is not the only one working in Pennsylvania.
I do know article 2 and the 14th have been raised simply from reading this state judges ruling.

Pennsylvania State Judge Upholds Halt To Certification, Finds Likelihood Mail-In Balloting Procedures Violate PA Constitution

UPDATE 11-28-2020 7 p.m.: Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismisses challenge to mail-in ballot procedures, vacates halt to certification.

legalinsurrection.com

Here's what's cute about this. Act 77 passed the GOP controlled Pa state legislature by a vote of 35-14 in the Senate and 138-61 in the Pa House.

Now after losing the election they now go running to the courts..."Well, well, your honor we didn't know that the law was unconstitutional when we passed it". LMAO!

 

[bacha29]

Just take notes and wait until Monday when Rachel Maddow gives you your talking points lady.

Like I told you before. Gather up your EVIDENCE of fraud and your CHECK BOOK and go see Rudy.