Packing it in in Pa.

[bacha29]

This evening a U.S. District Court judge who is also a well known Republican took Trump's law suit seeking to invalidate several million Pa ballots and threw it out of court along with a stern admonishment for the plaintiffs regarding the complete and total absence of evidence supporting their claims.

 

[Re-Raise]

This evening a U.S. District Court judge who is also a well known Republican took Trump's law suit seeking to invalidate several million Pa ballots and threw it out of court along with a stern admonishment for the plaintiffs regarding the complete and total absence of evidence supporting their claims.

Startling news!

Only the uneducated Trump base didn’t see that one coming.

I wonder what crazy claim they will try to make now? I am truly enjoying their stupidity.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Collusion!

 

[newfie]

This evening a U.S. District Court judge who is also a well known Republican took Trump's law suit seeking to invalidate several million Pa ballots and threw it out of court along with a stern admonishment for the plaintiffs regarding the complete and total absence of evidence supporting their claims.

 

[newfie]

Wayne Dupree Real Talk. Real Opinions. -

Real Talk. Real Opinions.

www.waynedupree.com

 

[vantexan]

This evening a U.S. District Court judge who is also a well known Republican took Trump's law suit seeking to invalidate several million Pa ballots and threw it out of court along with a stern admonishment for the plaintiffs regarding the complete and total absence of evidence supporting their claims.

Wasn't the judge a Democrat?

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Collusion!

Russian!

 

[Old Man Jingles]

This evening a U.S. District Court judge who is also a well known Republican took Trump's law suit seeking to invalidate several million Pa ballots and threw it out of court along with a stern admonishment for the plaintiffs regarding the complete and total absence of evidence supporting their claims.

Wasn't the judge a Democrat?

Yes ... Backass making things up as usual!

 

[bacha29]

Wayne Dupree Real Talk. Real Opinions. -

Real Talk. Real Opinions.

www.waynedupree.com

This was a county judge decision regarding 2300 ballots in a state where Trump lost by 81,000 votes. A very small victory in a legal battle where Trumps team right now is 2 wins 29 losses.

Yes ... Backass making things up as usual!

Judge Mathew Brannin is a long time Republican nominated by Barack Obama to serve in his current capacity.
Oh, BTW. Trump has asked for a second taxpayer funded recount in Georgia. That's not going to help the GOP senate candidates. But then again Trump never cared about anybody but himself.

 

[bacha29]

View attachment 318406

Get out your money honey. I'm sure you guys have already sent the maximum allowed by law along with some that isn't to help with this hopeless undertaking. Rudy's getting 20K a day and he'll be glad to take your money despite the fact that when the Pa judge asked him to present the evidence needed in order to grant the plaintiffs request, knowing that he could perjure himself in federal court Rudy's replay was...."This is not a fraud case".

 

[Wally]

Dead people voting and people voting that have no idea they voted equals Sleepy Joe will be an illegitimate President. If you call folk to "fix" their ballot, that's a big issue.

 

[Jumpin Jack Flash]

If Republicans are so stupid that they let the Democrats vote with dead people, then the Republicans aren’t bright and shouldn’t be in any office. MAGA

 

[Jumpin Jack Flash]

Trump supporters are telling America that they are dumb and the Democrats are geniuses with their corruption skills,

 

[fishtm2001]

Dead people voting and people voting that have no idea they voted equals Sleepy Joe will be an illegitimate President. If you call folk to "fix" their ballot, that's a big issue.

Evidence of dead people voting, please.

 

[vantexan]

This was a county judge decision regarding 2300 ballots in a state where Trump lost by 81,000 votes. A very small victory in a legal battle where Trumps team right now is 2 wins 29 losses.

Judge Mathew Brannin is a long time Republican nominated by Barack Obama to serve in his current capacity.
Oh, BTW. Trump has asked for a second taxpayer funded recount in Georgia. That's not going to help the GOP senate candidates. But then again Trump never cared about anybody but himself.

Nope, 2 wins, 1 loss. Most of those lawsuits weren't filed by the Trump campaign.

 

[fishtm2001]

Pennsylvania ​

Trump v. Boockvar, U.S. District Court for Middle District of Pennsylvania

An amended complaint from the Trump campaign drops claims it was denied meaningful access to observe and monitor the electoral process through its poll watchers, but alleges disparate treatment of mail-in voters among different counties, where in blue counties they had opportunities to fix their ballots. The campaign estimates more than 680,000 ballots were processed in two Pennsylvania counties, Allegheny and Philadelphia, "when no observation was allowed" and is seeking to block Boockvar from certifying the results of the election.

During a hearing Tuesday, Rudy Giuliani, arguing on behalf of the Trump campaign, made sweeping claims about mail-in voting, claiming "widespread, nationwide voter fraud, of which this is a part." Mark Aronchick, who argued on behalf of some county election boards, lambasted Giuliani, calling his arguments "disgraceful."

Result: The campaign filed a second amended complaint "to restore claims which were inadvertently deleted from their amended complaint, and to add claims based on newly learned facts," Mr. Trump's lawyers said in a filing with the court. The brief filed on November 21 rehashed claims the campaign appeared to abandon earlier in the week.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann granted a request from Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar to dismiss the lawsuit that alleged Republicans had been unconstitutionally disadvantaged because certain counties permitted voters to cure their mail ballots. Guiliani said late Saturday night that the campaign plans to appeal.

Trump and RNC v. Boockvar, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

At issue in the dispute is a deadline, extended by the secretary of state, for mail-in voters to verify proof of identification. The Trump campaign sought to block counties from allowing mail-in voters from providing missing proof of identification for ballots received between November 4 and November 6, which were segregated by elections officials as part of another pending dispute.

Result: Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt blocked counties from counting segregated ballots in their official tallies.

Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar, U.S. Supreme Court

Republicans asked the Supreme Court to review a ruling from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that allowed election officials to receive and count ballots received up to three days after Election Day if they were postmarked by November 3. The Trump campaign and Pennsylvania Republicans believe those ballots, which are being segregated by counties, should be invalidated.

Result: The Supreme Court has not yet taken action in the case, Justice Samuel Alito ordered counties to segregate late-arriving ballots and count them separately in response to an emergency request from Republicans.

Bognet v. Boockvar, 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

In a similar dispute to the challenge before the Supreme Court, four registered voters and a congressional candidate filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the extended deadline for mail-in ballots to be returned and counted, alleging the Pennsylvania Supreme Court violated the Constitution by allowing the late-arriving ballots to be counted. They asked the court to block the county boards of elections from counting ballots received during the deadline extension period.

Result: The 3rd Circuit ruled the individual plaintiffs lack legal standing to challenge the extended deadline.

Trump v. Montgomery County Board of Elections, Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County

The Trump campaign is seeking to toss out roughly 600 mail-in ballots and asked the state court to reverse a decision by the Montgomery County elections board denying their objection to counting mail-in ballots for which outer declaration envelopes were missing information.

Result: Judge Richard Haaz denied the Trump campaign's request to review the board's decision and toss out ballots.

Trump v. Bucks County Board of Elections, Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County

As in Montgomery County, the Trump campaign asked the court to review a decision by the county elections board denying their objection to the counting of certain ballots that allegedly suffered from deficiencies. The campaign is seeking to toss out 2,175 ballots with missing information, as well as another 76 either with unsealed privacy envelopes or with markings.

Result: A hearing has been scheduled.

Pirkle v. Wolf, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

Four Pennsylvania voters attempted to exclude presidential election results from Philadelphia, Montgomery, Delaware and Allegheny Counties, and block state officials from certifying the election results, alleging illegal votes were cast in those counties.

Result: The voters who brought the case voluntarily dismissed it Monday.

In re: Canvass of Absentee and Mail-In Ballots of November 3, 2020 General Election, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

The Trump campaign sought a review of a decision by the Philadelphia County Board of Elections to count five different categories of mail-in ballots. The Trump campaign wanted the court to invalidate 8,329 ballots because the voter failed to include certain handwritten information on the ballot-return envelope.

Result: The Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas ruled against the Trump campaign, but the campaign appealed to the Commonwealth Court. Now, the Philadelphia Board of Elections is asking for the dispute to be transferred to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

In re. Canvassing Observation, Pennsylvania Supreme Court

The dispute brought by the Trump campaign involves the Philadelphia County Board of Elections' pre-canvassing and canvassing of mail-in and absentee ballots at the Philadelphia Convention Center. The Trump campaign challenged the location where its election observers could watch the canvassing process, arguing they were too far to see individual markings on secrecy envelopes or determine whether they were properly completed.

Result: The trial court denied the Trump campaign's request for the county board to modify its work area for closer observation of the ongoing ballot canvassing, but Judge Christine Fizzano Cannon of the Commonwealth Court sided with the campaign and said observers should be allowed within 6 feet of the canvassing process. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, however, ruled 5-2 Tuesday against the Trump campaign, finding the board's regulations governing where observers could stand during the pre-canvassing and canvassing process were "reasonable in that they allowed candidate representatives to observe the board conducting its activities" as dictated by state election code.

 

[vantexan]

Pennsylvania ​

Trump v. Boockvar, U.S. District Court for Middle District of Pennsylvania

An amended complaint from the Trump campaign drops claims it was denied meaningful access to observe and monitor the electoral process through its poll watchers, but alleges disparate treatment of mail-in voters among different counties, where in blue counties they had opportunities to fix their ballots. The campaign estimates more than 680,000 ballots were processed in two Pennsylvania counties, Allegheny and Philadelphia, "when no observation was allowed" and is seeking to block Boockvar from certifying the results of the election.

During a hearing Tuesday, Rudy Giuliani, arguing on behalf of the Trump campaign, made sweeping claims about mail-in voting, claiming "widespread, nationwide voter fraud, of which this is a part." Mark Aronchick, who argued on behalf of some county election boards, lambasted Giuliani, calling his arguments "disgraceful."

Result: The campaign filed a second amended complaint "to restore claims which were inadvertently deleted from their amended complaint, and to add claims based on newly learned facts," Mr. Trump's lawyers said in a filing with the court. The brief filed on November 21 rehashed claims the campaign appeared to abandon earlier in the week.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann granted a request from Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar to dismiss the lawsuit that alleged Republicans had been unconstitutionally disadvantaged because certain counties permitted voters to cure their mail ballots. Guiliani said late Saturday night that the campaign plans to appeal.

Trump and RNC v. Boockvar, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

At issue in the dispute is a deadline, extended by the secretary of state, for mail-in voters to verify proof of identification. The Trump campaign sought to block counties from allowing mail-in voters from providing missing proof of identification for ballots received between November 4 and November 6, which were segregated by elections officials as part of another pending dispute.

Result: Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt blocked counties from counting segregated ballots in their official tallies.

Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar, U.S. Supreme Court

Republicans asked the Supreme Court to review a ruling from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that allowed election officials to receive and count ballots received up to three days after Election Day if they were postmarked by November 3. The Trump campaign and Pennsylvania Republicans believe those ballots, which are being segregated by counties, should be invalidated.

Result: The Supreme Court has not yet taken action in the case, Justice Samuel Alito ordered counties to segregate late-arriving ballots and count them separately in response to an emergency request from Republicans.

Bognet v. Boockvar, 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

In a similar dispute to the challenge before the Supreme Court, four registered voters and a congressional candidate filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the extended deadline for mail-in ballots to be returned and counted, alleging the Pennsylvania Supreme Court violated the Constitution by allowing the late-arriving ballots to be counted. They asked the court to block the county boards of elections from counting ballots received during the deadline extension period.

Result: The 3rd Circuit ruled the individual plaintiffs lack legal standing to challenge the extended deadline.

Trump v. Montgomery County Board of Elections, Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County

The Trump campaign is seeking to toss out roughly 600 mail-in ballots and asked the state court to reverse a decision by the Montgomery County elections board denying their objection to counting mail-in ballots for which outer declaration envelopes were missing information.

Result: Judge Richard Haaz denied the Trump campaign's request to review the board's decision and toss out ballots.

Trump v. Bucks County Board of Elections, Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County

As in Montgomery County, the Trump campaign asked the court to review a decision by the county elections board denying their objection to the counting of certain ballots that allegedly suffered from deficiencies. The campaign is seeking to toss out 2,175 ballots with missing information, as well as another 76 either with unsealed privacy envelopes or with markings.

Result: A hearing has been scheduled.

Pirkle v. Wolf, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

Four Pennsylvania voters attempted to exclude presidential election results from Philadelphia, Montgomery, Delaware and Allegheny Counties, and block state officials from certifying the election results, alleging illegal votes were cast in those counties.

Result: The voters who brought the case voluntarily dismissed it Monday.

In re: Canvass of Absentee and Mail-In Ballots of November 3, 2020 General Election, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

The Trump campaign sought a review of a decision by the Philadelphia County Board of Elections to count five different categories of mail-in ballots. The Trump campaign wanted the court to invalidate 8,329 ballots because the voter failed to include certain handwritten information on the ballot-return envelope.

Result: The Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas ruled against the Trump campaign, but the campaign appealed to the Commonwealth Court. Now, the Philadelphia Board of Elections is asking for the dispute to be transferred to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

In re. Canvassing Observation, Pennsylvania Supreme Court

The dispute brought by the Trump campaign involves the Philadelphia County Board of Elections' pre-canvassing and canvassing of mail-in and absentee ballots at the Philadelphia Convention Center. The Trump campaign challenged the location where its election observers could watch the canvassing process, arguing they were too far to see individual markings on secrecy envelopes or determine whether they were properly completed.

Result: The trial court denied the Trump campaign's request for the county board to modify its work area for closer observation of the ongoing ballot canvassing, but Judge Christine Fizzano Cannon of the Commonwealth Court sided with the campaign and said observers should be allowed within 6 feet of the canvassing process. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, however, ruled 5-2 Tuesday against the Trump campaign, finding the board's regulations governing where observers could stand during the pre-canvassing and canvassing process were "reasonable in that they allowed candidate representatives to observe the board conducting its activities" as dictated by state election code.

And? The big stuff is coming. They're just starting with all of this. And not all of the above was the Trump campaign or a Trump loss.

 

[fishtm2001]

And? The big stuff is coming. They're just starting with all of this. And not all of the above was the Trump campaign or a Trump loss.

On January 20th President Biden will be sworn in.

 

[newfie]

This was a county judge decision regarding 2300 ballots in a state where Trump lost by 81,000 votes. A very small victory in a legal battle where Trumps team right now is 2 wins 29 losses.

Judge Mathew Brannin is a long time Republican nominated by Barack Obama to serve in his current capacity.
Oh, BTW. Trump has asked for a second taxpayer funded recount in Georgia. That's not going to help the GOP senate candidates. But then again Trump never cared about anybody but himself.

one bite out of the ass's ass. your realize each one of these many "yea buts" are slowly piling up to organized election fraud and incompetence?

 

[newfie]

Get out your money honey. I'm sure you guys have already sent the maximum allowed by law along with some that isn't to help with this hopeless undertaking. Rudy's getting 20K a day and he'll be glad to take your money despite the fact that when the Pa judge asked him to present the evidence needed in order to grant the plaintiffs request, knowing that he could perjure himself in federal court Rudy's replay was...."This is not a fraud case".

whats a small donation to stop the spread of lunatic socialism