i already have here about 5 different times.List them.
President for life , sounds good to me !!! It's only been 40 years since the last good one !!!!Projecting. Trump's dream is to be president for life-and end the American experiment.
Some people's facts are different then other people's facts . And some people's facts are just plain stupid !!!"People often find ways to ignore or explain away the facts. A generation ago, this approach propped up faith healing and energy crystals; today, it fuels climate-change denialism and the anti-vaccination movement."
James Randi
Apparently not in this thread.i already have here about 5 different times.
That’s just what @newfie does when challenged, claims he already provided the answer. He did the same thing when I asked him to explain Trump’s healthcare plan. There is no answer so he pretends the question was already answered.Apparently not in this thread.
Trump campaign has only filed a handful. Other groups filed the rest.Nearly 40 is a few?
That’s just what @newfie does when challenged, claims he already provided the answer. He did the same thing when I asked him to explain Trump’s healthcare plan. There is no answer so he pretends the question was already answered.
Does it matter now that other states have certified? I could see politicians placating certain parts of the electorate bay delaying something as soon as it didn’t even matter anymore.PA State legislators are developing a joint resolution to freeze the certification because of the mountain of evidence they had seen last week , Sorry Gov. Wolf !!! BTW nobody here likes you and wants you impeached !!!! Little dictator !!!
Sure does.Does it matter now that other states have certified? I could see politicians placating certain parts of the electorate bay delaying something as soon as it didn’t even matter anymore.
According to the article, the legislature declined to do anything (supposedly unable due to time constraints) and the matter pushed off.Sure does.
It's not a rules aren't fair for me argument.According to the article, the legislature declined to do anything (supposedly unable due to time constraints) and the matter pushed off.
As I said before, the Trump campaign should have fought this battle before the election. But if they were confident they’d win outright, I guess it’s not surprising. Arguing the rules aren’t fair should always be done before the contest.
Says the one of the top deflectors on the BC.That’s just what @newfie does when challenged, claims he already provided the answer. He did the same thing when I asked him to explain Trump’s healthcare plan. There is no answer so he pretends the question was already answered.
That was charitable.Says the one of the top deflectors on the BC.
Act 77 was passed last year by the GOP controlled by a 138-61 margin and the GOP controlled Senate by a 35-14 vote. They were all for it believing that mail in ballots would help to improve Trump's chances of carrying Pa. If fact they were so confident that it would improve Trump's chances that they allowed the timeline to challenge the law's constitutional merits to expire.According to the article, the legislature declined to do anything (supposedly unable due to time constraints) and the matter pushed off.
As I said before, the Trump campaign should have fought this battle before the election. But if they were confident they’d win outright, I guess it’s not surprising. Arguing the rules aren’t fair should always be done before the contest.
That's not what I heard , apparently they were blown away by what they had seen at the hearings and they've been getting a lot of heat from the people who are very upset about what happened and the legislature is going to take action , we shall see !!!According to the article, the legislature declined to do anything (supposedly unable due to time constraints) and the matter pushed off.
As I said before, the Trump campaign should have fought this battle before the election. But if they were confident they’d win outright, I guess it’s not surprising. Arguing the rules aren’t fair should always be done before the contest.
Are you talking about Rudy's so called "hearing"? If that's the one you're talking about then FYI that so called "hearing" was not held by any court of law and therefore what anybody said was not under oath .That's not what I heard , apparently they were blown away by what they had seen at the hearings and they've been getting a lot of heat from the people who are very upset about what happened and the legislature is going to take action , we shall see !!!
The PA supreme court is mostly Democrat since Dictator Wolf took over . But the legislature is in charge of election rules constitutionally and they are mostly Republican .Act 77 was passed last year by the GOP controlled by a 138-61 margin and the GOP controlled Senate by a 35-14 vote. They were all for it believing that mail in ballots would help to improve Trump's chances of carrying Pa. If fact they were so confident that it would improve Trump's chances that they allowed the timeline to challenge the law's constitutional merits to expire.
The expired timeline combined with the plaintiffs failure to offer a single example of a mail in ballot being filed in a fraudulent manner is why the Pa. Supreme Court dismissed the suit unanimously .
Pa. was widely believed to be the state that would decide the election and that turned out to be the case
I wonder who's going to pay the court costs? . The plaintiffs were asking in addition to the court ruling in the plaintiffs favor they also wanted the taxpayers to pay the costs involved.