Swing by Chicago on your way down or back. Your return trip would probably be best as you can take advantage of your free health care once you get home. You`ll need it.
I just renewed my American healthcare, (any country for that matter), travel insurance for the year, at a cost of $105.00 anually.
I'm greatly covered in the US.
how do you pay for all these things Klein? travel, coverage, life?I just renewed my American healthcare, (any country for that matter), travel insurance for the year, at a cost of $105.00 anually.
I'm greatly covered in the US.
how do you pay for all these things Klein? travel, coverage, life?
The Cliff Claven of Canada !
.... So the question is two-fold, sober. First, in my drunken and drug abusing days, and in your drunken nights showing horrible judgement (I assume you drove in that contition) should we have had our Constitutional right infringed upon? Or do I just get around it by lying about my "habit"? And second, after "recovery" why should continue to allow this right to people who have shown such horrible judgement because now they've "found God"?
*New York City has more murders in a week than the entire nation of Canada does all year.
* We have no right to keep and bear arms. So leave your guns home if you're visiting, otherwise they'll be confiscated at the border.
We have very strict gun laws, and fully automatic weapons are pretty much illegal. It almost takes an Act of God to get a licence to own a pistol. (This may be a contributing factor as to why we only have about 600 homicides a year, nation-wide.)
Oh, and 1 more thing, if you ever do visit Canada, and go to a bank here to exchange money - you won't see armed security guards in the branch. Actually, no security guards at all at any bank. (We don't need them).
Sober, what's past is past.The bottom line is that, drunk or sober, a person needs to accept the consequences of whatever criminal acts they have committed and been convicted of in a court of law. One of the consequences of committing a felony or inflicting domestic violence is that the guilty person forfiets their right to possess firearms.
I wont minimize or make excuses for my poor choices in the past, but in my case I have no criminal record. I never got a DUII. I have never been arrested, charged with or convicted of any crime. In my entire lifetime I have had a grand total of one speeding ticket...25 years ago when I was 19. So the fact that I am a recovering alcoholic is pretty much irrelevant to the question of whether or not I should be allowed to own guns.
Sober, what's past is past.![]()
You really need to get your facts straight. It is easier to legally buy a handgun in Canada than it is in New York City. And it is actually quite easy for an American to bring a hunting rifle into Canada; you pay a $25 fee and get a few papers stamped and its a done deal. I know a guy who went caribou hunting in Alberta last year and he said it was a lot harder for him to get back in to the USA with his rifle than it was for him to go to Canada with it.
Now that we've established the specific, let's go to the general. I would be willing to bet that within recovery rooms your story, while like many in terms of emotional and mental state is somewhat different in legal repercussions. Please do not take offense, but I have sat across the table and had coffee with what could easily be defined as the criminally insane. That they had not yet been caught meant little. We have a mental health unit around here that will diagnose patients as "bi-polar" without regard to drug and alcohol abuse. And as so often the case, we see people all the time who walk around with the past not being the past. Some call it a "dry drunk". Again, I'm not trying to find new laws. I'm trying to see how the laws we have protect us from these individuals, some without a violent past but severely disturbed none the less. Maybe there is no answer and we are at the mercy of the jackal because that's the natural order of things.The bottom line is that, drunk or sober, a person needs to accept the consequences of whatever criminal acts they have committed and been convicted of in a court of law. One of the consequences of committing a felony or inflicting domestic violence is that the guilty person forfiets their right to possess firearms.
I wont minimize or make excuses for my poor choices in the past, but in my case I have no criminal record. I never got a DUII. I have never been arrested, charged with or convicted of any crime. In my entire lifetime I have had a grand total of one speeding ticket...25 years ago when I was 19. So the fact that I am a recovering alcoholic is pretty much irrelevant to the question of whether or not I should be allowed to own guns.
Boy, that line caught my attention! It only has to be "worth it" one dark night. How much is your life worth?But, just to have it sit at home for illegal self defense usage, it's not worth it.
Again, I'm not trying to find new laws. I'm trying to see how the laws we have protect us from these individuals, some without a violent past but severely disturbed none the less. Maybe there is no answer and we are at the mercy of the jackal because that's the natural order of things.
A citizen and not a subject? Wk might take issue with your assessment.Boy, that line caught my attention! It only has to be "worth it" one dark night. How much is your life worth?
Thank goodness I'm a citizen, and not a subject!