oldngray
nowhere special
Wrong.he has six years to find a way . you libs tried to say he failed on his promises as he was being sworn in.
It started before he was worn in.
Wrong.he has six years to find a way . you libs tried to say he failed on his promises as he was being sworn in.
Holy Communion?
You sailed right past id and ego, straight to superego, didn't you?!
Hold on a minute. Aren’t you one of those guys who often cites weasel zippers and the daily caller. I mean, that is when you’re not parroting what you heard on an Alex Jones podcast?Buzzfeed as a credible source... OMG
![]()
Unbelievable, that some would pin their hopes on such a NON-Credible source. At least wait till CNN confirms it.![]()
Hold on a minute. Aren’t you one of those guys who often cites weasel zippers and the daily caller. I mean, that is when you’re not parroting what you heard on an Alex Jones podcast?
We’ve been over this.so buzzfeed is correct? Mueller is wrong?
We’ve been over this.
I don’t know. Buzzfeed claims multiple sources. I think they may be on to something and have drawn a conclusion that Mueller is not ready to back. I don’t think they just made up a story.
Although I don’t expect it to happen, I would like to see a detailed response to Buzzfeeds question as to what Mueller deems to be inaccurate.
Again, I’m willing to see how Mueller clarifies all of it. My guess is that his report will eventually see the light of day regardless what Trump and Barr want. Either that or the House investigation goes full public at the Democrats insistence.see you spin it your way . you omit the point that the two buzzfeed reporters gave different accounts of the sourcing on two different networks . instead you spin your explanation in the most positive format possible.
Lol, good one.Hold on a minute. Aren’t you one of those guys who often cites weasel zippers and the daily caller. I mean, that is when you’re not parroting what you heard on an Alex Jones podcast?
this one by a MSM white house reporter didn't seem to get the same frenzy on CNN and MSNBC that the higher regarded buzzfeed received.
ABC's Karl: Sources say Mueller report is 'almost certain to be anti-climactic'
Ok. And if it is, so be it.this one by a MSM white house reporter didn't seem to get the same frenzy on CNN and MSNBC that the higher regarded buzzfeed received.
ABC's Karl: Sources say Mueller report is 'almost certain to be anti-climactic'
this one by a MSM white house reporter didn't seem to get the same frenzy on CNN and MSNBC that the higher regarded buzzfeed received.
ABC's Karl: Sources say Mueller report is 'almost certain to be anti-climactic'
That’s the difference between you and I. I never cite left wing sources here. Ever. I’ll look to see if a story makes the BBC, Reuters, WSJ, NPR, or The Hill because they all see pretty reputable.Lol, good one.
The thing I found interesting about the Buzzfeed thing is that they ran with it all day until Mueller discredited it. Now get back to your Huffpost bible.![]()
How much are they paying him compared to what he was making as a partner at that private practice law firm he was atMueller really doesn't want to release a "final" report because that will be the end of his investigation.
It's a children's song you heathen!Your bible talks?
I've never seen @tonyexpress cite left wing sources ... that doesn't appear to be a difference between you and he.That’s the difference between you and I. I never cite left wing sources here. Ever. I’ll look to see if a story makes the BBC, Reuters, WSJ, NPR, or The Hill because they all see pretty reputable.
That’s the difference between you and I. I never cite left wing sources here. Ever. I’ll look to see if a story makes the BBC, Reuters, WSJ, NPR, or The Hill because they all see pretty reputable.
I've never seen @tonyexpress cite left wing sources ... that doesn't appear to be a difference between you and he.