Anonymousposter
Member
A co worker today got an OLCC over his PST. The issue was he used 2 different colored inks. The pen he started with gave out, he got another one. Unfortunately with our management we were not surprised.
Was your manager trained by @59 Dano ?A co worker today got an OLCC over his PST. The issue was he used 2 different colored inks. The pen he started with gave out, he got another one. Unfortunately with our management we were not surprised.
Where is it written that you can’t use two different inks. I hope that person didn’t sign off on it.A co worker today got an OLCC over his PST. The issue was he used 2 different colored inks. The pen he started with gave out, he got another one. Unfortunately with our management we were not surprised.
Or if they did, they used 2 different color ink pens!Where is it written that you can’t use two different inks. I hope that person didn’t sign off on it.
He was like "you got to be kidding me" he did sign off, but was like I'm contacting the Senior manager as well as HR. Our Senior least listens to concerns so I'm sure it will be addressed.Where is it written that you can’t use two different inks. I hope that person didn’t sign off on it.
You cannot file a GFT for an OLCC, therefore they love to give them out. This manager sounds like a real jerk.He was like "you got to be kidding me" he did sign off, but was like I'm contacting the Senior manager as well as HR. Our Senior least listens to concerns so I'm sure it will be addressed.
He recently gave an OLCC to another person for getting new ear plugs, instead of reusing the ones he had been.
This is the same manager that hollered at us because the feeder markets having been getting too much volume , more than planes can handle.
Me too, because it really irritates managers."I refused to sign off on my OLCC." Cracks me up every time.
He sounds like a real Richard.He recently gave an OLCC to
another person for getting new ear plugs, instead of reusing the ones he had been.
It cracks me up how desperate you are to be respected."I refused to sign off on my OLCC." Cracks me up every time.
Just lets the other manager they have to hunt down to sign that you wouldn't sign know how petty your manager can be. Nothing wrong with standing your ground, even though an OLCC means nothing."I refused to sign off on my OLCC." Cracks me up every time.
Needing respect from anonymous people on the internet is kind of toward the bottom of my priority list.It cracks me up how desperate you are to be respected.
It's amusing to think of it being a case of standing one's ground. It's documentation of a conversation. When it's part of the disciplinary process, it still counts, signed or not.Just lets the other manager they have to hunt down to sign that you wouldn't sign know how petty your manager can be. Nothing wrong with standing your ground, even though an OLCC means nothing.
Then why bother validating?It's amusing to think of it being a case of standing one's ground. It's documentation of a conversation. When it's part of the disciplinary process, it still counts, signed or not.
because it's the first step in discipline, even though it's not categorized as such and is non-GFTable. Anything that can be used for decisions about discipline by management should be GFTable to remove it from history if it's invalid or just friggin stupid.Then why bother validating?
Intimidation comes to mind.
Would you prefer a system where a manager can simply put in OLCCs (either legitimate or pure BS) without the employee's knowledge, then use them against the employee?Then why bother validating?
All five of my notifications are you quoting me. It’s clearly important to you.Needing respect from anonymous people on the internet is kind of toward the bottom of my priority list.
No, I would rather the employee have reciprocal rights, to prevent manager abuse.Would you prefer a system where a manager can simply put in OLCCs (either legitimate or pure BS) without the employee's knowledge, then use them against the employee?
Still satisfying to let aIt's amusing to think of it being a case of standing one's ground. It's documentation of a conversation. When it's part of the disciplinary process, it still counts, signed or not.