I think that's what we've been doing.Another example of what gives the IC model the bad reputation it has. More fuel on the fire as well as a complete and unmanageable mess in the end. In the meantime let's look for ideas that might help him.
I think that's what we've been doing.Another example of what gives the IC model the bad reputation it has. More fuel on the fire as well as a complete and unmanageable mess in the end. In the meantime let's look for ideas that might help him.
Dano advises against any legal action(s) against FedEx. Gee, wonder why.
So what?For those keeping score at home, there are people here who advise that you pay a lawyer to represent you when you get written up. No, really!
This is about legal action against a collection agency and/or a contractor. Not FedEx. For those keeping score at home, there are people here who advise that you pay a lawyer to represent you when you get written up. No, really!
So what?
Management loves to build a case to get rid of who they want and getting written up is usually the first step. If someone wants to pay out of their own pocket to protect themselves then that's their business.
I would think a letter from an attorney would have just the opposite effect.
So you are suggesting that an at will employee with performance issues hiring a lawyer will get mgt to back off?
I would think that if legal got a letter from a lawyer of an employee, they would be pushing to get that employee terminated ASAP while making sure the process was airtight and ironclad. Nobody wants a litigation magnet on their hands. Why tip your hand so quickly?
I would think that if legal got a letter from a lawyer of an employee, they would be pushing to get that employee terminated ASAP while making sure the process was airtight and ironclad. Nobody wants a litigation magnet on their hands. Why tip your hand so quickly?
If nothing else that employee would have a huge bulls eye squarely on their back.
Bingo. Every OLCC and letter is another step in the "progressive discipline process". That is why you need to contest everything. Dano would have you believe that FedEx isn't OLCC or letter-happy. Right. Witness the recent spate of policy dictating OLCCs for any lates. That's fair, isn't it?
Have a couple of days of lates, then you get a letter, and pretty soon you're out the door. Perfectly fair. And we all know that employees are never singled-out and//or targeted by management.
Usually, that employee already glows neon orange and has a huge bulls eye squarely on their back. Once you're at that point, an attorney can only help you, not the opposite.
With that logic, why don't we all bust in on $500 for prepaid law for ourselves?Just in case anyone is confused, FedEx will fire everyone for any crazy reason they can think of.
Unless you hire a lawyer. In that case, you will never ever be fired for anything.
With that logic, why don't we all bust in on $500 for prepaid law for ourselves?