Maybe start a 401k?I hope you have someone doing your taxes for you lmao.
Maybe start a 401k?I hope you have someone doing your taxes for you lmao.
Always be included in?.. we were talking about weekly wages, which is how we are paid. It depends upon the conversation you are having. lol The government takes and takes money, whether or not they keep all of it is a different story.Which is far from what people actually pay. FYI....everyone gets the standard deduction. And should always be included.
SOBMaybe start a 401k?
Shush. You don't even work 80 hours a month.I heard @Gumby is petitioning for 80hr work weeks
What is this “work” you speak of?Shush. You don't even work 80 hours a month.
You should try it sometime.What is this “work” you speak of?
So you are saying that you have 35% taken out of your weekly paycheck?Always be included in?.. we were talking about weekly wages, which is how we are paid. It depends upon the conversation you are having. lol The government takes and takes money, whether or not they keep all of it is a different story.
We aren't all as dumb and naive as you were.Yeah but what 25yr old thinks about taxes...young, dumb and full of... energy
No I didn't say that, I don't fall into that bracket.So you are saying that you have 35% taken out of your weekly paycheck?
Correction. Americas riches top 10%.Minus about 35% in taxes. Someone’s gotta subsidize the cost of living for America’s laziest 47%!
Absolutely, be very careful and read everything. This looks like the worst contract ever for working people. Much longer days and less OT. People thinking they would make bank have got to WTFU! And who would actually make it to retirement?There wouldn’t from what I know it’s OT after 10 for 4 days. What would it be like 3 hours of ot for 3 day. This would be a huge pay cut.
Are any of us lazy? Who do you know that's lazy? I really don't know anyone like this.Correction. Americas riches top 10%.
And really, how's that going to work? As I saw someone else say on here, this would be bastardized and quick. Who does not think this?It's not as though we are going to immediately go to 70 hour weeks or a 6 day work schedule upon contract ratification. The Company simply wants to have either (or both) of these options available to them in case they are needed within the next 5 years.
Just goes to show you that people do not value their time, would rather work then have a life. Sad that there would be those willing to give their souls to Big Brown for pieces of green paper.................You should try it sometime.
I could see working that Christmas week but not all year. No way.Just goes to show you that people do not value their time, would rather work then have a life. Sad that there would be those willing to give their souls to Big Brown for pieces of green paper.................
And they would make less because of the way they would move work days around. Hopefully this proposal will not even make it for a vote. This is the most "dicksonian" thing I've ever seen proposed on a contract. These kids need to know their history.Just goes to show you that people do not value their time, would rather work then have a life. Sad that there would be those willing to give their souls to Big Brown for pieces of green paper.................