Poop Head
Judge me.
Seems like common sense to me. The job has a set start time, but no set end time. Plan accordinglyThis is such a cut and dry issue that I'm having trouble believing I have to work so hard to defend this position.
Seems like common sense to me. The job has a set start time, but no set end time. Plan accordinglyThis is such a cut and dry issue that I'm having trouble believing I have to work so hard to defend this position.
Well back when I was hired as a preloader there was a set time 0300 to 0900. Never was alerted to there being times when you would be required to stay longer than that shift. Maybe it’s just our center that gives set times.Seems like common sense to me. The job has a set start time, but no set end time. Plan accordingly
Seems like common sense to me. The job has a set start time, but no set end time. Plan accordingly
Seems like common sense to me. The job has a set start time, but no set end time. Plan accordingly
Get this. Today I over heard some loaders try to leave after their shift was over at 9 because one had school and the other had another job. They were being made to clean up and load the other belts because ups is so cheap they don’t want to pay for the guys they need. A union steward ended up going with them to clock out and made damn sure the sup was set straight. I can’t believe thatwould try to threaten them like that.
So make sure ya all vote this contract and let’s get it above 30 percent for par timers voting when they have majority vote. . Typically how everyone complains but does the one and only thing they can to help them self’s which is VOTEGet real. It is a PT job for $10/hr and no benefits. And you have to pay Union dues to get treated like dirt.
Usually what I see happening is that management allows their favorites to punch out at the same time they are threatening others with job abandonment for punching out. This ruins the company argument in a hurry.And when you lose your second job because you were not "allowed" to leave UPS at the normal time, what is UPS's responsibility in the matter? I believe when a person is financially damaged by another person's actions, they have legal recourse. It's not a contractual issue, so there's no requirement to go through the grievance process. Slap a part time sup with a law suit, might change his tune real quick.
Leaving without "permission" is not job abandonment. Just because management wants to trump up disciplinary charges against someone by redefining a term does not make it true.
Now that they will be making $13 an hour they will be rolling in the dough and be able to quit those other jobs.There has to be some give and take. The only reason a lot of part timers can even afford to work for UPS is because they have second and/or third job. If you can't make it to your second job on time because a preload sup won't "let" you leave you won't be keeping that second job for very long. You don't keep that second job, you can't afford to work for UPS anymore. Doesn't exactly make sense for UPS to screw over the employees who actually care about getting to work on time. I was lucky enough to have a second job that was pretty flexible, most others aren't so lucky, and UPS needs to respect that.
And management can call it whatever they want, the actual definition of job abondonment is leaving a job with no intention of returning, not simply leaving before getting "permission". It is an administrative designation so hr can put something in the file when they terminate someone who no call no shows for several days. Most companies, UPS included in areas with strong locals, give you three days of ncns before calling it job abandonment.
Thank you, Captain Obvious.After a year einstein.
1 (800) 321-6742 Occupational Safety and Health AdministrationYou care about workers safety and well being? I think not.
View attachment 209324
View attachment 209325
View attachment 209329
Gee, I wonder why the turnover and injury rate is so high?
Reality is never trumped.
Usually what I see happening is that management allows their favorites to punch out at the same time they are threatening others with job abandonment for punching out. This ruins the company argument in a hurry.
hi marvinThis is why we don't accept the "Seniority gives you the right to work, not to go home."
So they can't pull that BS on a senior employee.
hi marvin
The cognitive dissonance is astounding.
It's not antiquated, that's the definition. Every employer uses that definition. Only management, and I guess many union officials, with no understanding of HR use the term incorrectly. By using that term they are trying to make it sound like you voluntarily quit. If you voluntarily quit, the union can't really fight to get your job back. That makes a huge difference, and why I object to the term being used for situations that do not meet the definition. If the company terminates you for job abandonment, the first thing the union would have to do before they could even defend you is establish that you did not abandon your job.
Apparently, in your building, leaving without permission is not grounds for termination. I'm a big boy, I know when my job is done, if management needs me to stay longer, they can direct me to. If doing so has adverse effects on me financially, and I inform them of that, then they can face the consequences.
I get that UPS can, and has, terminated people for any reason they can make up. The main reason for this is that in one case, an arbitrator decided that the cardinal sins list was inclusive, not exclusive, completely ignoring the fact that the company and the union agreed that the cardinal sins list was exclusive. What the hell is the point of an inclusive cardinal sins list? So, yes, UPS can basically do what they want, but why make it easier on them and allow them to make up imaginary bs to fire us over?
As I said, I'm dealing with reality. And the reality is that many companies, including UPS, see leaving early without notification or permission as job abandonment. So that's what it is.
It is grounds for termination in my building. The fact that it isn't enforced is a separate issue.