Storming the Capitol

MAKAVELI

Well-Known Member
A woman was trampled to death in this video while the Blue Lives Matter/ Law and Order party was attacking the police. SMH.....
 

Tom MacDonald

Max E. Pads
Are you still "horribly smitten" with Trump, @The Orange Offender ? LOL

The ‘QAnon Shaman’ Just Flipped on Trump

Jake Angeli, who prefers to be known as the “QAnon Shaman,” was one of the most visible rioters at the Capitol earlier this month: shirtless, carrying a spear, and wearing a viking headdress complete with horns, face paint, and a fur coat as he roared throughout the Senate chamber.

Now Angeli wants to testify against the former president he was once “horribly smitten” with, his lawyer told the AP.

Angeli, whose real name is Jacob Chansley, was indicted earlier this month on six counts, including violent entry and disorderly conduct in the Capitol building and obstructing an official proceeding. He’s scheduled to be arraigned Friday afternoon in Washington, D.C.

In a memorandum earlier this month arguing to keep Angeli detained pending his trial, prosecutors also alleged that he wrote a threatening note to former Vice President Mike Pence and left it on the dais, telling him: “It’s only a matter of time, justice is coming.” (Prosecutors also said that Angeli “demonstrates scattered and fanciful thoughts, and is unable to appreciate reality.”)

Angeli told VICE News earlier this month he was “not worried at all” about the pending investigation into him. “I’m quite proud of my participation,” Angeli said at the time. “I’d like to think I was an observer of history being made right in front of me.”

Since then, however, Angeli has changed his tune. “He felt like he was betrayed by the president,” Angeli’s attorney Al Watkins, who has also represented the St. Louis gun couple, told the AP. Watkins said in a statement to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that his client wants to talk about “whether the words of former President Trump were understood by Mr. Chansley to be nothing short of an invitation to go to the Capitol with the President to ‘fight like hell.’”
I told you that guy is pedophile look at the tattoo on his chest.

He is literally a "little boy lover"

338F2D3500000578-0-image-a-23_1461694924980.jpg
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
What a ridiculous thing to say.

Remember when Democraps at least pretended to be against giant corporations and the power they have over people and government?

Good times!
Lulz.
Never said I was for or against big corporations But when it comes to Big Tech I support the idea of of them being regulated as public utilities. Regulation is coming as we now see Mark Zucker announcing ahead of the oncoming regulation his intent to depoliticize Facebook. Then again in your case regulation might mean that you will no longer have access to a FREE communications platform including the free one you use down at the public library.
 

tonyexpress

Whac-A-Troll Patrol
Staff member
'I've Been Shot!' Screams AOC As Ted Cruz Greets Her With Set Of Friendly Finger Guns

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Sources at the Capitol confirmed today that a significant brouhaha broke out between Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Ted Cruz.

The incident occurred as Ocasio-Cortez was walking out of the Capitol Building and passed by Cruz, who smiled and shot her a set of cool-guy finger guns. "Howdy, AOC! How's my favorite socialist rep? Haha, just playin' with ya, kid."

:love-very:
 

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
For those of you who think an attempted coup took place in D.C., you might want to check out Myanmar to see what one actually looks like.
 

El Correcto

god is dead
For those of you who think an attempted coup took place in D.C., you might want to check out Myanmar to see what one actually looks like.
These people know it wasn’t a coup. Liberal boomers clutching their pearls being hysterical as always. The replays of these jackasses at the capitol aren’t going away anytime soon.
They will keep repeating their lies and narrative around it, probably cut darkest days in American history ads against trump supporters in elections. They are going to milk that little riot for all it’s worth.
 

Tom MacDonald

Max E. Pads
Hope we can all understand that Kamala was Joe’s VP pick because of the color of her skin. Not because of her performance in the Democratic primaries.

It must hurt the ears of a libturd to hear another fellow libturd point that out

I would have been fine with a Tulsi presidency. Too bad your hatred for trump landed you with a sleepy joe presidency. You voted for him :)
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member

So when we get to the impeachment trial, Republican senators will hear the case brought by house managers. Trump will have a fiery defense that does nothing to refute the charges but focuses on the election “being stolen”.

The senators know that’s not true. Many of them have come out publicly and said that’s not true.

So at that point, what is the rationale for acquitting him?

Attorneys must hate clients who can’t STFU.
 

1989

Well-Known Member

So when we get to the impeachment trial, Republican senators will hear the case brought by house managers. Trump will have a fiery defense that does nothing to refute the charges but focuses on the election “being stolen”.

The senators know that’s not true. Many of them have come out publicly and said that’s not true.

So at that point, what is the rationale for acquitting him?

Attorneys must hate clients who can’t STFU.
Lock him up....
Lock him up...
Lock him up...
 

Jones

fILE A GRIEVE!
Staff member

So when we get to the impeachment trial, Republican senators will hear the case brought by house managers. Trump will have a fiery defense that does nothing to refute the charges but focuses on the election “being stolen”.

The senators know that’s not true. Many of them have come out publicly and said that’s not true.

So at that point, what is the rationale for acquitting him?

Attorneys must hate clients who can’t STFU.
When you're so guilty that even your lawyers quit on you....
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member

So when we get to the impeachment trial, Republican senators will hear the case brought by house managers. Trump will have a fiery defense that does nothing to refute the charges but focuses on the election “being stolen”.

The senators know that’s not true. Many of them have come out publicly and said that’s not true.

So at that point, what is the rationale for acquitting him?

Attorneys must hate clients who can’t STFU.
A shame it's not a constitutional proceeding.
 

It will be fine

Well-Known Member

So when we get to the impeachment trial, Republican senators will hear the case brought by house managers. Trump will have a fiery defense that does nothing to refute the charges but focuses on the election “being stolen”.

The senators know that’s not true. Many of them have come out publicly and said that’s not true.

So at that point, what is the rationale for acquitting him?

Attorneys must hate clients who can’t STFU.
The truth is Trump could walk into the Senate and take a dump on the floor as his defense and Republicans would vote to acquit. Their decision has nothing to do with the defense presented or the charge he’s accused of.
 
Top