Storming the Capitol

tonyexpress

Whac-A-Troll Patrol
Staff member
Given the number of retailers no longer willing to sell his junk even this new one may not either. When cameras spotted him leaving the WH with the words "martial law" plainly written on his notes retailers started cancelling his contracts.
But he's going the extra mile to get the commie business back.lol

P.S. You know it's a parody website, right? :happy-very:
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage

'I've Been Shot!' Screams AOC As Ted Cruz Greets Her With Set Of Friendly Finger Guns

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Sources at the Capitol confirmed today that a significant brouhaha broke out between Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Ted Cruz.

The incident occurred as Ocasio-Cortez was walking out of the Capitol Building and passed by Cruz, who smiled and shot her a set of cool-guy finger guns. "Howdy, AOC! How's my favorite socialist rep? Haha, just playin' with ya, kid."

:love-very:

Insurrectionist Truther Doesn’t Believe He Was At Capitol



soljglyqquthoplqe1oj.jpg





ROSE CITY, MI—Dismissing the accusations as nothing more than the baseless attempts of a deep-state conspiracy to attack former President Trump’s supporters, insurrectionist truther Thomas Keleher declared Monday that he doesn’t believe he was present at the Capitol riot. “Look, anybody could’ve taken selfies of me storming the Capitol and posted them to my Facebook page to make it look like I was there—it’s fake news,” said Keleher, telling law enforcement who arrested him that the 73-minute video on his phone depicting him punching out a Capitol window and later rifling through papers on Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s desk was clearly a deep-fake and nothing he ever would have actually done. “You’re telling me I drove 700 miles to Washington, stayed with three other Trump supporters I know in a hotel room at the Marriott, stormed the Capitol, and then bragged about it, just like the Parler and Discord screen names I use showed that I did? How naive do you think I am? And I guarantee you that the recollections I do have of storming the Capitol are because Bill Gates used one of his 5G satellites to pump fake memories into my brain.” Keleher also reportedly told investigators that if he had been at the Capitol, he would have assuredly been there as part of some false-flag operation, in which case there was no question in his mind that he was secretly an FBI operative.
Funny but not impactfully funny ...

AOC parody vs Mr Nobody parody?

AOC parody wins every time!
 

It will be fine

Well-Known Member
If you believe in the rule of law it makes all the difference.
So in your view the “rule of law” allows the president to commit tons of crime, quickly resign from office and then be free to run again facing no consequence? Strange definition ya got there, methinks it’s politically motivated.
 

Jones

fILE A GRIEVE!
Staff member
It's like if the govt was trying to prosecute a guy for crimes he committed while he was the leader of a gang and his lawyers are planning a defense based on the idea that you can't prosecute him now because he's not the leader of the gang anymore. But then the lawyers all quit because the guy wants them to defend him by claiming that he's still the leader of the gang, which makes even less sense than what they were planning.
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
It's like if the govt was trying to prosecute a guy for crimes he committed while he was the leader of a gang and his lawyers are planning a defense based on the idea that you can't prosecute him now because he's not the leader of the gang anymore. But then the lawyers all quit because the guy wants them to defend him by claiming that he's still the leader of the gang, which makes even less sense than what they were planning.
That's several logical fallacies all rolled into one ... I assume you were being disingenuous.
  • False Dilemma/False Dichotomy
  • Slippery Slope Fallacy
  • Hasty Generalization
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
It's like if the govt was trying to prosecute a guy for crimes he committed while he was the leader of a gang and his lawyers are planning a defense based on the idea that you can't prosecute him now because he's not the leader of the gang anymore. But then the lawyers all quit because the guy wants them to defend him by claiming that he's still the leader of the gang, which makes even less sense than what they were planning.
Two points appear to be at the forefront of the prosecution . First for 77 days Trump kept spinning the baseless claim that the election was a fraud and that he won. The second one is that he was impeached while still in office which in turn renders the fact that he's now out of office a mute point .
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
So in your view the “rule of law” allows the president to commit tons of crime, quickly resign from office and then be free to run again facing no consequence? Strange definition ya got there, methinks it’s politically motivated.
What crime? And you well know you can't subvert the Constitution to take out political enemies. And he didn't resign from office and as a private citizen Congress doesn't have jurisdiction to try him.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Two points appear to be at the forefront of the prosecution . First for 77 days Trump kept spinning the baseless claim that the election was a fraud and that he won. The second one is that he was impeached while still in office which in turn renders the fact that he's now out of office a mute point .
It's moot, not mute. And the article of impeachment wasn't presented to Congress until after Trump left. The purpose of a Senate trial is to determine if the crimes that caused the impeachment rise to the level that necessarily require removal from office. You can't remove someone who's already gone. It's unconstitutional and a farce. And strictly about trying to find a way to bar Trump from holding Federal office again.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member

It's like if the govt was trying to prosecute a guy for crimes he committed while he was the leader of a gang and his lawyers are planning a defense based on the idea that you can't prosecute him now because he's not the leader of the gang anymore. But then the lawyers all quit because the guy wants them to defend him by claiming that he's still the leader of the gang, which makes even less sense than what they were planning.
Yogi Berra lives!
 

Sportello

Well-Known Member
Here you go, hope you feel better.

In Effort To Appeal To Socialists, Mike Lindell Introduces ‘OurPillow’

CHASKA, MN—Mike Lindell, more commonly known as the “My Pillow Guy,” is making headlines once again with his newest line of pillows. MyPillow is now targeting the socialist demographic with the release of OurPillow.

“MyPillow did really well in the Trump era, but now with a new administration, it’s time to try out OurPillow, my comrades!”

View attachment 327184
Thanks for proving the point.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
It's like if the govt was trying to prosecute a guy for crimes he committed while he was the leader of a gang and his lawyers are planning a defense based on the idea that you can't prosecute him now because he's not the leader of the gang anymore.
It's more like a company's disciplinary board meeting to discuss firing an employee that has already resigned.
 
Top