Storming the Capitol

[newfie]

Nope. He's a one term loser.

2 an 0 on impeachments

 

[zubenelgenubi]

Manson just spoke. He didn’t tell anyone to specifically murder anyone. His followers believed it’s what he wanted.

So he didn't "just" speak? Make up your mind.

 

[1989]

Because there are clear limits on the punishment for impeachment. If the democrats believed they really had a case, they would have just let the AG pursue criminal charges against Trump. Upon conviction he would be facing jail time and preclusion from holding office again. But they knew they had no case, and their only chance at trying to block him from running again was this sham of an impeachment. Bill Clinton got a more thorough trial for a blow job.

Clinton was 45% guilty of lying to an unrelated question to the whitewater investigation.
Trump was 57% guilty of starting an insurrection.

 

[newfie]

Manson just spoke. He didn’t tell anyone to specifically murder anyone. His followers believed it’s what he wanted.

he should have been found innocent.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Trump was charged as a criminal? Was he detained? Held in a cell until a bail hearing? Why wasn’t trump sitting at the defense table?

No, he would have needed to commit a crime for that to happen.

 

[newfie]

Clinton was 45% guilty of lying to an unrelated question to the whitewater investigation.
Trump was 57% guilty of starting an insurrection.

trump was not impeached he was show trialed in a kangaroo court .

 

[1989]

No, he would have needed to commit a crime for that to happen.

That’s why an impeachment is a political trial. Ttku

 

[1989]

trump was not impeached he was show trialed in a kangaroo court .

That politics

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

That’s why an impeachment is a political trial. Ttku

He was acquitted in the political kangaroo court.
He wasn't even charged in a real court.
Because there was no crime.
Ttku.

 

[1989]

He was acquitted in the political kangaroo court.
He wasn't even charged in a real court.
Because there was no crime.
Ttku.

That’s politics. It’s was not a criminal trial

 

[It will be fine]

So he didn't "just" speak? Make up your mind.

He convinced a bunch of people a crisis was imminent. He got them agitated and angry. He told his followers they needed to act to further the cause. His followers killed a handful of people as a result. All he did was speak though. Freedom of speech, right?

 

[upsgrunt]

He lost the presidency and both houses of congress in 4 years. Truly a political master.

Pelosi and Schumer lost 2 impeachments in 4 years- true political masters.

 

[It will be fine]

Pelosi and Schumer lost 2 impeachments in 4 years- true political masters.

Democrats won the presidency and Senate after the first one, so kinda.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

He was acquitted in the political kangaroo court.
He wasn't even charged in a real court.
Because there was no crime.
Ttku.

That’s politics. It’s was not a criminal trial

That's what I just said.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

His followers killed a handful of people as a result.

Name these people and the causes of death.
You know you've been lied to right?
Wake up lady.

 

[1989]

That's what I just said.

Why do you hate the constitution. It was tried in a proper court.

 

[1989]

Name these people and the causes of death.
You know you've been lied to right?
Wake up lady.

Nobody died now?

 

[zubenelgenubi]

He convinced a bunch of people a crisis was imminent. He got them agitated and angry. He told his followers they needed to act to further the cause. His followers killed a handful of people as a result. All he did was speak though. Freedom of speech, right?

So you think that feeding your followers illicit hallucinogens that make them more receptive to suggestion is protected by the first amendment? Interesting. I'll file that away for the future.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

Nobody died now?

Directly as a result of the riot? Just rioters, who were not fed illicit hallucinogens, and made their own decisions and were responsible for their own actions.

 

[1989]

Directly as a result of the riot? Just rioters, who were not fed illicit hallucinogens, and made their own decisions and were responsible for their own actions.

It could be argued that what comes out of Trumps mouth is a hallucinogenic.
So the only difference is whether your followers are taking drugs?