floridays
Well-Known Member
Actually it wasn't.Why do you hate the constitution. It was tried in a proper court.
No proper court allows a member of the plaintiffs to sit as a member of the jury and be the "fair and impartial judge."
You describe a kangaroo, banana republic proceeding.
By the Constitutional definition it was not a trial of impeachment.
Article I, § 3, cl. 6
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present
Why do you hate the Constitution?