Macbrother
Well-Known Member
I already posted some:Again, name one of these lawsuits that had a hearing where evidence was introduced and considered?
Bowyer et al. vs Ducey et al. Arizona. Ruling: Fraud allegations vague, implausible. Evidence unreliable or irrelevant.
Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar et al. Pennsylvania. Ruling: "This Court has been presented with strained
legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations unsupported by evidence."
Donald J Trump for President vs Hobbs. Arizona. Trump's own lawyers admitted affidavits submitted were spam. Under questioning none of the witnesses indicated they had a basis to believe their vote was improperly counted. Case dismissed.
Look at the cases for yourself. I don't know where this silly notion of "The courts refused to hear anything!!!!" came from, right-wing ideologues shouting into a microphone, no doubt; but again - all of these cases are a matter of public record. See them for yourselves.
Democrats have no such power. America saw four years of Trump and said "No thanks," simple as that.Big difference between Democrats taken by surprise in 2016 and their colluding to make sure Trump couldn't win in 2020.