Teamster Buyout?

[UnionStrong]

Oh, you’re one of those people.

You do realize that you are either covered by or expected to comply with whatever was on that piece of paper, don’t you?

STFU, you company shill.

 

[Oh Shoot]

Oh, you’re one of those people.

You do realize that you are either covered by or expected to comply with whatever was on that piece of paper, don’t you?

 

[UnionStrong]

View attachment 526256

Geezus….

 

[tourists24]

Oh, you’re one of those people.

You do realize that you are either covered by or expected to comply with whatever was on that piece of paper, don’t you?

Bothers ya doesn’t it?

 

[Oh Shoot]

Bothers ya doesn’t it?

Struck a nerve

 

[AllTheBellsAndWhistles123]

Anywho…..can the first person who receives their buyout offer letter please post a redacted copy of it here? I am curious as to the terms, conditions and timeline. Thx

 

[AllTheBellsAndWhistles123]

Bothers ya doesn’t it?

Not one bit—-thankfully we had very few of you “tough guys” in the BOG.

 

[Oh Shoot]

Anywho…..can the first person who receives their buyout offer letter please post a redacted copy of it here? I am curious as to the terms, conditions and timeline. Thx

Sure thing deskjockey





Not

 

[tourists24]

How would a VOLUNTARY resignation “conflict with the terms of this agreement”?

Because part of contract law covers any pay, benefit, or terms of employment that have to be negotiated on. Unilaterally making a move like this is violating our collective bargaining agreement. Of course we’re waiting to see if UPS decides to test that. Why do you think that in over 100 years this is just now being a possibility?

 

[tourists24]

Not one bit—-thankfully we had very few of you “tough guys” in the BOG.

Hahaha. It DOES bother you

 

[anonymous23456]

It's the US state that's just north of North Carolina...... geez, where did you get your education?

That is too high up...must be a trans.

 

[AllTheBellsAndWhistles123]

Because part of contract law covers any pay, benefit, or terms of employment that have to be negotiated on. Unilaterally making a move like this is violating our collective bargaining agreement. Of course we’re waiting to see if UPS decides to test that. Why do you think that in over 100 years this is just now being a possibility?

Your competition, primarily Amazon, is stealing your lunch money.

UPS laughed at REA, RPS, FedEx Ground and Amazon. Who’s laughing now?

 

[tourists24]

Your competition, primarily Amazon, is stealing your lunch money.

Quite possibly

 

[BrownFlush]

Your competition, primarily Amazon, is stealing your lunch money.

UPS laughed at REA, RPS, FedEx Ground and Amazon. Who’s laughing now?

The piss poor management/decisions at the top continues.
You reap what you sow. It's the law.

 

[Oh Shoot]

Your competition, primarily Amazon, is stealing your lunch money.

UPS laughed at REA, RPS, FedEx Ground and Amazon. Who’s laughing now?

 

[AllTheBellsAndWhistles123]

The piss poor management/decisions at the top continues.
You reap what you sow. It's the law.

Home Depot thrived under Carol—-in time, UPS will do the same.

 

[AllTheBellsAndWhistles123]

View attachment 526260

No but I’d be happy to help her.

 

[IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U]

The piss poor management/decisions at the top continues.
You reap what you sow. It's the law.

We only sat 20 air trailers this year..

 

[BrownFlush]

Home Depot thrived under Carol—-in time, UPS will do the same.

Sure thing.
What you're seeing isn't really what you're seeing.

 

[UnionStrong]

Your competition, primarily Amazon, is stealing your lunch money.

UPS laughed at REA, RPS, FedEx Ground and Amazon. Who’s laughing now?

UPS?