A
anonymous6
Guest
Re: contract approval
no.
out of principle.
no.
out of principle.
I want to know if there is anyone out there that approves of this tentative agreement. If so, please speak your mind, win me over. I won't backlash and I hope others don't,as well. I just don't see it but I'd be a fool to think it wouldn't pass. I just want to know who's voting "yes"
You should be voting NO on your supplement instead. We only have summer and peak casual drivers. Even this new 9.5 language will protect our RI cover drivers based upon stipulation #1 and #2. You need to enforce the intent of language in your contract. Our cover drivers start at $18.75 under the new deal. Now, our casual drivers will be a pool of part timers. No more outside casuals. The time and duration that the casuals work will come off their progression. So if your PT to drive for the summer vacation and peak can take up to 24 weeks a year off your progression.By having $16/hour part time cover drivers with no 9.5 rights go out with all the work!!! You know as well as I do there are a ton of morons where you are that will do the job for $16/hour.... and since they are part time, NO progression.... just that adorable $.70 an hour raise.How are they going to eliminate OT for full time drivers?
Why do you think they started training facilities other than where you are? So they can train 100 part time package drivers a week, work them all 11hr days and eliminate OT from full timers.
By having $16/hour part time cover drivers with no 9.5 rights go out with all the work!!! You know as well as I do there are a ton of morons where you are that will do the job for $16/hour.... and since they are part time, NO progression.... just that adorable $.70 an hour raise.
Why do you think they started training facilities other than where you are? So they can train 100 part time package drivers a week, work them all 11hr days and eliminate OT from full timers.
A PART TIME job is exactly that. NO part time job can support a family, so for people still riding that horse, it's time to dismount.
I'm not going to lie, unless I hear something at the meeting with my local that REALLY sways my opinion, I plan on voting yes.
Is the job perfect? By no means. But as others have said, we shovel cardboard for quite a good bit of money. I plan on having a nice chunk saved up by my retirement to not be dependent on a pension, so that's not such a bother either.
On the nosey. Hoffa/hall did too much talking and not enough listening!!sure feel sold out right now. Were the Union bosses listening to us at all???
Down south with the us getting the lowest pension nation wide, and this contract proposal offering as additional 200 for 30-35 years making it a whopping 3200 for 30 years and 3700 for 35 years is one reason I am voting no.. When I see a post from a driver out west who gets, after 25 years 3800-3900, and here we get 2000 after 25 years? Something is way out of whack..I am planning on retiring very soon, and was hoping for an increase in our pension but 200 dollars is ridiculous !!
You should be voting NO on your supplement instead. We only have summer and peak casual drivers. Even this new 9.5 language will protect our RI cover drivers based upon stipulation #1 and #2. You need to enforce the intent of language in your contract. Our cover drivers start at $18.75 under the new deal. Now, our casual drivers will be a pool of part timers. No more outside casuals. The time and duration that the casuals work will come off their progression. So if your PT to drive for the summer vacation and peak can take up to 24 weeks a year off your progression.
I think you miss my point: compared to what other Blue Collar Workers make in similar companies The TA far exceeds what employees of the companies I listed make,and would (IMO of course) be astounded anyone would consider a 'No' voteHow about this concept? Our organizing factions get out of the halls and into the streets and ORGANIZE and bring these folks up instead of lowering us down!!!! At 728 we are getting companies with 10 to 25 employees because our so called organizers continue to grasp for the low hanging fruit. Yes growth is nice but really? 10 to 25 new Teamsters at Joe's Deli hardly equates to several thousand Fred-Ex starving employees....BC
Sorry Rudy I don't get how you of all people can call anyone else an idiot. Your heart is in the right place, but majority of your posts show stupidity.
Sorry Rudy I don't get how you of all people can call anyone else an idiot.
Im no psychic.... but Im guessing your feeder? Im in the south, you and I can both agree we have the weakest union and the most dog eat dog employees in the country.
Is there new language allowing a new classification of driver? If not, and this is already allowed, why don't we see it happening on a widespread basis now?
Down south with the us getting the lowest pension nation wide, and this contract proposal offering as additional 200 for 30-35 years making it a whopping 3200 for 30 years and 3700 for 35 years is one reason I am voting no.. When I see a post from a driver out west who gets, after 25 years 3800-3900, and here we get 2000 after 25 years? Something is way out of whack..I am planning on retiring very soon, and was hoping for an increase in our pension but 200 dollars is ridiculous !!
710's agreement already has triple time paid for 9.5'sNot sure if that was part of the smoke or the mirrors.
I don't know how many years you have in but people live off Social Security making a lot less then $2000 a month. It's called planning and have a budget for what your income is. You can't live like a king when you retire if you don't plan. Putting all your eggs in one basket for safe keeping hasn't been a good idea for ever.
A PART TIME job is exactly that. NO part time job can support a family, so for people still riding that horse, it's time to dismount.
I'm not going to lie, unless I hear something at the meeting with my local that REALLY sways my opinion, I plan on voting yes.
Is the job perfect? By no means. But as others have said, we shovel cardboard for quite a good bit of money. I plan on having a nice chunk saved up by my retirement to not be dependent on a pension, so that's not such a bother either.