The Russians Are Coming, The Russians Are Coming!

BigUnionGuy

Got the T-Shirt
Yep. He's the big winner here. Dividing Americans, keeping Clinton out of office, and having a pliable maroon in the White House.



56281637_10156387288502297_1427342658958786560_n.jpg
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
We were dealing with Soviets, not Russia. And if you think things are set in stone forever you don't know history. You only know what communist sympathizers tell you.
war is very profitable. lots of $$$ for US weapons manufacturers expanding NATO (when reagan promised he would not)

haha hedges calls mueller "saint mueller" LOL

 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
biggest influence in US elections are big money from the corporate sector and israel recently says chomsky. says its not a big deal if trump did corruption with russians anyways because the system is corrupt:

 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member

rickyb

Well-Known Member
What does Mr. Wolff typically suggest is the alternative or fix to the downsides of capitalism?
he always talks about worker coops like they do in parts of italy and spain. workers voting at the job, workers electing supervisors, and worker ownership.

but i dont think its the cure to all economic and ecological problems, although i am very much in favor of democracy as a way of countering too much power. we need a more efficient system of production where we arent throwing away things just because 1 part of them doesnt work, and a system with more efficient property utilization.

we've been consuming very hard and this wont last.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
This intractable morass, Blumenthal argues, led directly to the demonization of Russia. Trump’s anti-interventionist rhetoric, however disingenuous, triggered what Blumenthal calls “a wild hysteria” among the foreign policy elites. Trump calls the invasion of Iraq a mistake. He questions the arming of Syrian jihadists and deployment of U.S. forces in Syria. He is critical of NATO. At the same time, he has called for better relations with Russia.

“Joining with the dead-enders of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, who were desperate to deflect from their crushing loss, the mandarins of the national security state worked their media contacts to generate the narrative of Trump-Russia collusion,” Blumenthal writes. “Out of the postelection despair of liberals and national security elites, the furor of Russiagate was born. This national outrage substituted Russia for ISIS as the country’s new folk devil and painted Trump as Russian president Vladimir Putin’s Manchurian candidate.”

“Almost overnight, hundreds of thousands of liberals were showing up at postelection rallies with placards depicting Trump in Russian garb and surrounded by Soviet hammer-and-sickle symbols,” Blumenthal writes. The FBI and the intelligence community, organizations that have long spied upon and harassed the left and often liberals, became folk heroes. NATO, which was the instrument used to destabilize the Middle East and heighten tensions with Russia because of its expansion in Eastern Europe, became sacrosanct.

“In its obsession with Moscow’s supposed meddling, the Democratic Party elite eagerly rehabilitated the Bush-era neoconservatives, welcoming PNAC [Project for the New American Century] founder William Kristol and ‘axis of evil’ author David Frum into the ranks of the so-called ‘resistance,’ ” Blumenthal writes. “The Center for American Progress, the semiofficial think tank of the Democratic Party, consolidated the liberal-neocon alliance by forging a formal working partnership with the American Enterprise Institute, the nest of the Iraq war neocons, to ‘stand up to Russia.’ ”

Those in the alternative media who question the Russia narrative and chronical the imperial disasters are in this new version of the Cold War branded as agents of a foreign power and hit with algorithms from Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter to deflect viewers from reading or listening to their critiques. Politicians, such as Bernie Sanders and Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn, who push back against the war lust are smeared with the same nefarious charge. It is, as Blumenthal writes, a desperate bid by the war industry and the interventionists to mask the greatest strategic blunder in American history, one that signals the end of American hegemony.

“In the face of their own failure, America’s national security elites had successfully engineered a new Cold War, wagering that the reignited conflict would preserve their management of savagery abroad and postpone the terrible reckoning they deserved at home,” Blumenthal concludes.


The corporate state, its legitimacy in tatters, seeks to make us afraid in order to maintain its control over the economic, political and military institutions.
It needs mortal enemies, manufactured or real, at home or abroad, to justify its existence and mask its mismanagement and corruption. This narrative of fear is what Antonio Gramsci called a “legitimation doctrine.” It is not about making us safe—indeed the policies the state pursues make us less secure—but about getting us to surrender to the will of the elites. The more inequality and injustice grow, the more the legitimation doctrine will be used to keep us cowed and compliant. The doctrine means that the enemies of the United States will never be destroyed, but will mutate and expand; they are too useful to be allowed to disappear. It means that the primary language of the state will be fear. The longer the national security state plays this game, the more a fascist America is assured.

Reckoning With Failure in the War on Terror
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Mike Gravel‏Verified account @MikeGravel 18h18 hours ago




if you're going bankrupt because of deductibles and working part-time jobs to make ends meet and you're not sure if your kid can go to college and there's no dignity in your life anymore and you're furious at the world then "DON JR MET RUSKIES" probably won't make you vote Dem

43 replies 607 retweets 2,908 likes
 
Top