Vertical?

[Bubblehead]

I
s

i
t

j
u
s
t

m
y

c
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
,

o
r

a
r
e

a
l
l

p
o
s
t
s

e
l
o
n
g
a
t
e
d
?

 

[local804]

I have the same problem here. Thank God it wasnt just the few beers I had tonight.Hope it is better on Sunday.

 

[spif91]

I have the same problem here. Thank God it wasnt just the few beers I had tonight.Hope it is better on Sunday.

˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙puǝ ʎɯ uo ǝɹǝɥ sɯǝlqoɹd on

 

[old levi's]

Mine to. Now it stacks 1 letter across all the way down the page.

 

[Jones]

Click
Apparently the short term fix is to try changing your screen resolution. Or make the switch to Firefox, which I would recommend regardless.

 

[over9five]

No problem with Safari.

 

[Big Babooba]

M
i
n
e
A
r
e

 

[grgrcr88]

I have no problem. Have you tried closing the sidebar?

 

[cheryl]

If you're using IE, especially older versions of IE, you will experience this because the way that this software displays the pages. The developers have been working on a version that will fix these issues, it's supposed to be released next week.

Those of you that asked for the who's chatting sidebar to be displayed on more pages will have to be patient for a few more days. The sidebars make the problems worse for the people browsing with older versions of IE so I'm disabling them on post display pages. Once we get to install the bug fix version of the software I'll turn everything back on.

Here's an another discussion about this that has a little more info.

http://www.browncafe.com/forum/f12/forum-question-there-anyway-stop-bunching-up-305914/

I'm really sorry for the inconvenience.

 

[Bubblehead]

No problem with Safari.

Experiencing the same thing with Safari as well.

 

[over9five]

Oh jeez Cheryl, don't be sorry. They can wait a while, it's certainly not a big inconvenience.

If it was, they'd get a real browser like Safari or Firefox!!!!

 

[over9five]

Experiencing the same thing with Safari as well.

And then again.....

 

[helenofcalifornia]

God knows what you are wandering into when you enter the chat room sight unseen! You might find Klein or ROCKETMAN. jk

 

[dilligaf]

And then again.....

Oh jeez Cheryl, don't be sorry. They can wait a while, it's certainly not a big inconvenience.

If it was, they'd get a real browser like Safari or Firefox!!!!

Ooooooops! LMAO

 

[moreluck]

OK, who corrected the spelling of vertical??

 

[UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)]

OK, who corrected the spelling of vertical??

Not me--I was at the movies.

 

[pickup]

Not me--I was at the movies.

You should have said "Not I -- I was at the movies." I was actually looking for the post where you used a reflexive pronoun where you shouldn't have . This will have to do for now and I dedicate this post to Rod who is looking for some payback.

 

[UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)]

You should have said "Not I -- I was at the movies." I was actually looking for the post where you used a reflexive pronoun where you shouldn't have . This will have to do for now and I dedicate this post to Rod who is looking for some payback.

What he should be looking for is life after UPS.

 

[satellitedriver]

You should have said "Not I -- I was at the movies." I was actually looking for the post where you used a reflexive pronoun where you shouldn't have . This will have to do for now and I dedicate this post to Rod who is looking for some payback.

The antecedent was in a separate sentence. The -- acts as a period, in this case.
The reflective rule only applies in an enclosed sentence structure.
At least that is the way I remember the rules, but me may be wrong.

 

[Bubblehead]

What he should be looking for is life after UPS.

8360 posts in 27 months, who needs to look for a life?