There tractor trailer drivers are at least 14$ cheaper.
As far as bang for you buck goes package car drivers are worth the money by far. That's what I take from that article.Less than that.
Contractors are looking for feeders in my area. They pay $.37-.42 per mile with no mileage guarantee. There is a post in the Fed Ex section from a guy that says they regularly get to terminals and lose runs to non-Fed Ex drivers (Swift, Werner and the like). Teams make a little more, but if they cannot turn and burn and have to sit at a terminal waiting for loads, with no guarantee, they are losing too.
As far as bang for you buck goes package car drivers are worth the money by far. That's what I take from that article.
What I took was that Surepost is going to grow and grow.
Before everyone gets crazy over this, think it through. I see this as an opportunity for BOTH UPS and the Teamsters.
Today, there are three seperate feeder networks (UPS Small package, Freight, and Cartage). From an overall perspective, not allowing one unit to move the goods of the other is not the most efficient way to go. That is clear.
Allowing goods to be moved by different units has to potential to lower UPS cost and raise its flexibility to operate.
So, take advantage of that. Take some of those additional profits and build that into the next contract.
Rather than fight this, turn it into a win-win. Go get your fair share.
Yup, that's where all us displaced Feeder drivers are going to end up. And the Package drivers displaced by us will be loading and unloading trailers.As far as bang for you buck goes package car drivers are worth the money by far. That's what I take from that article.
Before everyone gets crazy over this, think it through. I see this as an opportunity for BOTH UPS and the Teamsters.
Today, there are three seperate feeder networks (UPS Small package, Freight, and Cartage). From an overall perspective, not allowing one unit to move the goods of the other is not the most efficient way to go. That is clear.
Allowing goods to be moved by different units has to potential to lower UPS cost and raise its flexibility to operate.
So, take advantage of that. Take some of those additional profits and build that into the next contract.
Rather than fight this, turn it into a win-win. Go get your fair share.
Before everyone gets crazy over this, think it through. I see this as an opportunity for BOTH UPS and the Teamsters.
Today, there are three seperate feeder networks (UPS Small package, Freight, and Cartage). From an overall perspective, not allowing one unit to move the goods of the other is not the most efficient way to go. That is clear.
Allowing goods to be moved by different units has to potential to lower UPS cost and raise its flexibility to operate.
So, take advantage of that. Take some of those additional profits and build that into the next contract.
Rather than fight this, turn it into a win-win. Go get your fair share.
if this takes effect never will be, a UPS feeder driver.
This resonates with the Hostess issues.
Nope.Judging from the posts here, I'm assuming UPS lost billions in the last few quarters, right?
Hostess was bought out by hedge funds and looted dry while constantly demanding that the unionized workforce give up more and more in health care/pensions/wages. Upper level managers were given bonuses while the company was posting losses. The business was run as a personal piggy bank and there was never any impetus to innovate or stay competitive.
I fail to see the similarities.