We want your AR

[sailfish]

I’m trying to figure out how strongly you hold on to the second amendment fantasy that gun rights are to defeat a corrupt American government.

They get whatever they want. You get assault rifles.

If it ever came to a real fight, they win, you lose.

I guess there's nothing to worry about then so they should just leave them alone already.

 

[silenze]

He owns the largest gun shop in the state the third largest East of the Mississippi . So what do you have? Probably like many you have few assets live paycheck to paycheck and are ill equipped to keep pace with the changing economy and that gun represents the only sense of empowerment available to your sorry little life albeit a twisted and distorted one .

I dont know what your guy is smoking. You can use anything larger then a .22 caliber semi auto rifle to legally hunt deer. This includes the ar15 .223
Many people legally hunt using an ar15

 

[bbsam]

These two rifles are the same.

Why do the crazy mentally ill killers want the bottom one?

Why can’t the sane responsible folks be happy with the top one.

 

[sailfish]

Why do the crazy mentally ill killers want the bottom one?

Because politicians and the media play up the AR-15 to be some kind of ultimate mass shooter badass machine. So edgelords and copycat killers from all across the country get this idea in their head that if they want to be the ultimate mass shooter badass and get as much infamy as possible, they gotta use an AR-15 or something that looks similar too.

 

[oldngray]

Because politicians and the media play up the AR-15 to be some kind of ultimate mass shooter badass machine. So edgelords and copycat killers from all across the country get this idea in their head that if they want to be the ultimate mass shooter badass and get as much infamy as possible, they gotta use an AR-15 or something that looks similar too.

20 or 30 years ago AK-47 was the poster child for scary guns.

Because its all about how the guns look. Leave logic at the door.

 

[Fred's Myth]

I’m trying to figure out how strongly you hold on to the second amendment fantasy that gun rights are to defeat a corrupt American government.

They get whatever they want. You get assault rifles.

If it ever came to a real fight, they win, you lose.

I'd be willing to bet the Jews in Poland prior to WWII would have been overjoyed to have assault rifles.

Invading forces are not limited to your own government.

 

[bbsam]

Because politicians and the media play up the AR-15 to be some kind of ultimate mass shooter badass machine. So edgelords and copycat killers from all across the country get this idea in their head that if they want to be the ultimate mass shooter badass and get as much infamy as possible, they gotta use an AR-15 or something that looks similar too.

20 or 30 years ago AK-47 was the poster child for scary guns.

Because its all about how the guns look. Leave logic at the door.

So banning these really wouldn’t infringe upon gun rights at all. It would limit style options, something that isn’t constitutionally protected.

 

[oldngray]

So banning these really wouldn’t infringe upon gun rights at all. It would limit style options, something that isn’t constitutionally protected.

A pointless ban would certainly infringe.

 

[It will be fine]

20 or 30 years ago AK-47 was the poster child for scary guns.

Because its all about how the guns look. Leave logic at the door.

Then why would you care if they ban the scary looking ones?

 

[bbsam]

A pointless ban would certainly infringe.

How?

 

[vantexan]

Then why would you care if they ban the scary looking ones?

Because after that you would come after the non-scary ones because they do the same thing.

 

[bbsam]

Because after that you would come after the non-scary ones because they do the same thing.

Did that happen last time?

 

[oldngray]

Because after that you would come after the non-scary ones because they do the same thing.

Thats their goal. Eventually eliminate all private gun ownership. One step at a time.

 

[bbsam]

A pointless ban would certainly infringe.

How?

 

[vantexan]

Did that happen last time?

When was the last time?

 

[oldngray]

How?

Definition of INFRINGE

 

[bbsam]

When was the last time?

Assault weapons ban expired 15 years ago — time to bring it back

 

[bbsam]

Definition of INFRINGE

Ok. But if the same rifle is available but looks different, what right is being infringed upon?

 

[oldngray]

Ok. But if the same rifle is available but looks different, what right is being infringed upon?

Why the ban then?

Can't answer that can you?

 

[bbsam]

Why the ban then?

Can't answer that can you?

Because they seem to be the choice of mass murderers.

Why not ban them?

Can’t answer that, can you? Seems you now understand it wouldn’t violate the second amendment so you are making progress.