Who is the Victim - Blasey or Kavanaugh ... or Both?
- Thread starter Old Man Jingles
- Start date
floridays
Well-Known Member
I can assume you conceded? If you kill someone and you happened to hate them, are they dead times two, or just dead. When you allow a government to criminalize thought, or enhance punishment based on thought, I believe that will be a road you wish you never traveled, unfortunately we are already on that road. Think about it.
Jkloc420
Do you need an air compressor or tire gauge
I'm not going to be there forever and the union leadership do to by laws are forcing it
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Not surprising you hang out on 4chan.
A lot of the people there are rapists, child molesters, and white supremacists. I'm sure you're just there for the entertainment like me though.... It's fun.
Jkloc420
Do you need an air compressor or tire gauge
she is getting old
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
So is the Obesity in Chief.
Gerontocracies don't work
El Correcto
god is dead
I don’t browse 4chan because of what you’ve mentioned about the kiddy porn I used to from time to time but it’s honestly a pretty terrible forum just by it’s design.
That was taken from a screenshot posted on reddit.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
/pol is pretty fun.
Just stay away from/b and you'll be aight.
floridays
Well-Known Member
Better amigo,
sorry I've got to be a jackass, you may or may not be a contributing factor. Only you and the Mods know.
newfie
Well-Known Member
you guys lowered the bar and then suddenly discovered morality when your guy left office.
BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
two negatives but the pic says it all...the clock is ticking for us all but everything says before 6 years
newfie
Well-Known Member
It's kind if sad , we have to root for her expedited natural demise in hopes of saving the republic from the liberal cancer.
BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
Random but needed.. A sexual predator hiding in the bushes.
Was telling a neighbor tonight how I've thought about the Kavanaugh situation:
In a criminal trial, a jury finds the defendant either "guilty" or "not guilty" of a crime or crimes. They don't say "This guy is innocent!" Why? Because the accused might very well have committed the crime (think OJ Simpson). But their guilt has to be proven using facts and evidence. If those things are not provided, the accused can't be declared guilty. So "not guilty" might mean nothing more than "No evidence to support the charge". Not "this guy definitely didn't do it".
So I think about the position the swing Senators like Susan Collins and Jeff Flake were in over the weekend. And I frame their decisions to vote yes to Kavanaugh as having found him "Not guilty" of the accusations. Because they had a choice to make, and supporting evidence for the accusations against Kavanaugh hadn't been presented to them. Voting against his nomination would have been a reaction to feelings rather than facts.
I personally feel that Kavanaugh is a giant "I went to Yale" dude bro
who should have been passed over for one of Trump's other Court nominee finalists anyway. But I can still separate that out from my opinion on whether or not his nomination process gave his accusers a fair shake at providing evidence that would have destroyed his chances for sure. They didn't. And the left should acknowledge it.
El Correcto
god is dead
At least you’re some what competent enough to recognize the mental loop holes you’re jumping through to continue hanging your hat on he’s a rapist.Was telling a neighbor tonight how I've thought about the Kavanaugh situation:
In a criminal trial, a jury finds the defendant either "guilty" or "not guilty" of a crime or crimes. They don't say "This guy is innocent!" Why? Because the accused might very well have committed the crime (think OJ Simpson). But their guilt has to be proven using facts and evidence. If those things are not provided, the accused can't be declared guilty. So "not guilty" might mean nothing more than "No evidence to support the charge". Not "this guy definitely didn't do it".
So I think about the position the swing Senators like Susan Collins and Jeff Flake were in over the weekend. And I frame their decisions to vote yes to Kavanaugh as having found him "Not guilty" of the accusations. Because they had a choice to make, and supporting evidence for the accusations against Kavanaugh hadn't been presented to them. Voting against his nomination would have been a reaction to feelings rather than facts.
I personally feel that Kavanaugh is a giant "I went to Yale" dude bro
How did his nomination process not give them a fair shake, maybe they should of forced her to hand over the therapy notes? Why do they need to break her arm to get her proof?
El Correcto
god is dead
The lady was a pathological liar and the second the boyfriend’s statement hit the media it started losing wind real quick. Allegedly stealing her ex’s credit card after cheating on him, helping a friend pass a polygraph, made up about doorways and lying about a fear of flying. The lady seems like a pathological liar and sociopathic, who just so happens to have a political angle to motivate her.
If we are going to pursue justice for her and people of her ilk, I want Larry Sinclair’s accusations to have a full fbi investigation.
about doorways and lying about a fear of flying. The lady seems like a pathological liar and sociopathic, who just so happens to have a political angle to motivate her. If we are going to pursue justice for her and people of her ilk, I want Larry Sinclair’s accusations to have a full fbi investigation.
floridays
Well-Known Member
In a criminal trial the presumption is innocence. Everything else you said isWas telling a neighbor tonight how I've thought about the Kavanaugh situation:
In a criminal trial, a jury finds the defendant either "guilty" or "not guilty" of a crime or crimes. They don't say "This guy is innocent!" Why? Because the accused might very well have committed the crime (think OJ Simpson). But their guilt has to be proven using facts and evidence. If those things are not provided, the accused can't be declared guilty. So "not guilty" might mean nothing more than "No evidence to support the charge". Not "this guy definitely didn't do it".
So I think about the position the swing Senators like Susan Collins and Jeff Flake were in over the weekend. And I frame their decisions to vote yes to Kavanaugh as having found him "Not guilty" of the accusations. Because they had a choice to make, and supporting evidence for the accusations against Kavanaugh hadn't been presented to them. Voting against his nomination would have been a reaction to feelings rather than facts.
I personally feel that Kavanaugh is a giant "I went to Yale" dude bro
floridays
Well-Known Member
To be honest, I prefer none of the three. George W would be the least of the miscreants in my opinion. I love this country as founded, don't want a D or R to run through us. My stance, my opinion, that is where I stand.Random but needed.. A sexual predator hiding in the bushes.
floridays
Well-Known Member
Hey brother, I like you, You've been nice to me, I have returned in kind.... because I wanted to. I would just suggest you evaluate things legally and not from feelings, just my observation.Was telling a neighbor tonight how I've thought about the Kavanaugh situation:
In a criminal trial, a jury finds the defendant either "guilty" or "not guilty" of a crime or crimes. They don't say "This guy is innocent!" Why? Because the accused might very well have committed the crime (think OJ Simpson). But their guilt has to be proven using facts and evidence. If those things are not provided, the accused can't be declared guilty. So "not guilty" might mean nothing more than "No evidence to support the charge". Not "this guy definitely didn't do it".
So I think about the position the swing Senators like Susan Collins and Jeff Flake were in over the weekend. And I frame their decisions to vote yes to Kavanaugh as having found him "Not guilty" of the accusations. Because they had a choice to make, and supporting evidence for the accusations against Kavanaugh hadn't been presented to them. Voting against his nomination would have been a reaction to feelings rather than facts.
I personally feel that Kavanaugh is a giant "I went to Yale" dude bro