Who is the Victim - Blasey or Kavanaugh ... or Both?

[DriveInDriveOut]

Lol. You happy with your new contract?

No.
D*.
Lol.

 

[floridays]

Well when they brag about it...

I can assume you conceded? If you kill someone and you happened to hate them, are they dead times two, or just dead. When you allow a government to criminalize thought, or enhance punishment based on thought, I believe that will be a road you wish you never traveled, unfortunately we are already on that road. Think about it.

 

[Jkloc420]

You and your co-workers just voted in a contract that agrees to lower full time compensation. UPS is trying to catch up and y’all are helping them. WTF is wrong with you?

I'm not going to be there forever and the union leadership do to by laws are forcing it

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

View attachment 216021

Not surprising you hang out on 4chan.

A lot of the people there are rapists, child molesters, and white supremacists. I'm sure you're just there for the entertainment like me though.... It's fun.

 

[Jkloc420]

Not surprising you hang out on 4chan.

A lot of the people there are rapists, child molesters, and white supremacists. I'm sure you're just there for the entertainment like me though.... It's fun.

she is getting old

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

she is getting old

So is the Obesity in Chief.
Gerontocracies don't work

 

[El Correcto]

Not surprising you hang out on 4chan.

A lot of the people there are rapists, child molesters, and white supremacists. I'm sure you're just there for the entertainment like me though.... It's fun.

I don’t browse 4chan because of what you’ve mentioned about the kiddy porn I used to from time to time but it’s honestly a pretty terrible forum just by it’s design.


That was taken from a screenshot posted on reddit.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

I don’t browse 4chan because of what you’ve mentioned about the kiddy porn I used to from time to time but it’s honestly a pretty terrible forum just by it’s design.


That was taken from a screenshot posted on reddit.

/pol is pretty fun.
Just stay away from/b and you'll be aight.

 

[floridays]

Not surprising you hang out on 4chan.

A lot of the people there are rapists, child molesters, and white supremacists. I'm sure you're just there for the entertainment like me though.... It's fun.

Better amigo,
sorry I've got to be a jackass, you may or may not be a contributing factor. Only you and the Mods know.

 

[newfie]

I’m denying nothing. It’s just that their scumbaggeey doesn’t whitewash scumbaggery on the right. It doesn’t work that way.

you guys lowered the bar and then suddenly discovered morality when your guy left office.

 

[BrownFlush]

I don’t believe she isn’t dead being controlled by some sort of electric shocks convulsing her body into making noises and movement.

two negatives but the pic says it all...the clock is ticking for us all but everything says before 6 years

 

[newfie]

two negatives but the pic says it all...the clock is ticking for us all but everything says before 6 years

It's kind if sad , we have to root for her expedited natural demise in hopes of saving the republic from the liberal cancer.

 

[newfie]

Time to end this thread

 

[BrownFlush]

Random but needed.. A sexual predator hiding in the bushes.

 

[Box Ox]

There was not one shred of evidence to support one allegation Ford made. The same goes for the other clowns.

Was telling a neighbor tonight how I've thought about the Kavanaugh situation:

In a criminal trial, a jury finds the defendant either "guilty" or "not guilty" of a crime or crimes. They don't say "This guy is innocent!" Why? Because the accused might very well have committed the crime (think OJ Simpson). But their guilt has to be proven using facts and evidence. If those things are not provided, the accused can't be declared guilty. So "not guilty" might mean nothing more than "No evidence to support the charge". Not "this guy definitely didn't do it".

So I think about the position the swing Senators like Susan Collins and Jeff Flake were in over the weekend. And I frame their decisions to vote yes to Kavanaugh as having found him "Not guilty" of the accusations. Because they had a choice to make, and supporting evidence for the accusations against Kavanaugh hadn't been presented to them. Voting against his nomination would have been a reaction to feelings rather than facts.

I personally feel that Kavanaugh is a giant "I went to Yale" dude bro who should have been passed over for one of Trump's other Court nominee finalists anyway. But I can still separate that out from my opinion on whether or not his nomination process gave his accusers a fair shake at providing evidence that would have destroyed his chances for sure. They didn't. And the left should acknowledge it.

 

[El Correcto]

Was telling a neighbor tonight how I've thought about the Kavanaugh situation:

In a criminal trial, a jury finds the defendant either "guilty" or "not guilty" of a crime or crimes. They don't say "This guy is innocent!" Why? Because the accused might very well have committed the crime (think OJ Simpson). But their guilt has to be proven using facts and evidence. If those things are not provided, the accused can't be declared guilty. So "not guilty" might mean nothing more than "No evidence to support the charge". Not "this guy definitely didn't do it".

So I think about the position the swing Senators like Susan Collins and Jeff Flake were in over the weekend. And I frame their decisions to vote yes to Kavanaugh as having found him "Not guilty" of the accusations. Because they had a choice to make, and supporting evidence for the accusations against Kavanaugh hadn't been presented to them. Voting against his nomination would have been a reaction to feelings rather than facts.

I personally feel that Kavanaugh is a giant "I went to Yale" dude bro who should have been passed over for one of Trump's other Court nominee finalists anyway. But I can still separate that out from my opinion on whether or not his nomination process gave his accusers a fair shake at providing evidence that would have destroyed his chances for sure. They didn't. And the left should acknowledge it.

At least you’re some what competent enough to recognize the mental loop holes you’re jumping through to continue hanging your hat on he’s a rapist.


How did his nomination process not give them a fair shake, maybe they should of forced her to hand over the therapy notes? Why do they need to break her arm to get her proof?

 

[El Correcto]

The lady was a pathological liar and the second the boyfriend’s statement hit the media it started losing wind real quick. Allegedly stealing her ex’s credit card after cheating on him, helping a friend pass a polygraph, made up about doorways and lying about a fear of flying. The lady seems like a pathological liar and sociopathic, who just so happens to have a political angle to motivate her.

If we are going to pursue justice for her and people of her ilk, I want Larry Sinclair’s accusations to have a full fbi investigation.

 

[floridays]

Was telling a neighbor tonight how I've thought about the Kavanaugh situation:

In a criminal trial, a jury finds the defendant either "guilty" or "not guilty" of a crime or crimes. They don't say "This guy is innocent!" Why? Because the accused might very well have committed the crime (think OJ Simpson). But their guilt has to be proven using facts and evidence. If those things are not provided, the accused can't be declared guilty. So "not guilty" might mean nothing more than "No evidence to support the charge". Not "this guy definitely didn't do it".

So I think about the position the swing Senators like Susan Collins and Jeff Flake were in over the weekend. And I frame their decisions to vote yes to Kavanaugh as having found him "Not guilty" of the accusations. Because they had a choice to make, and supporting evidence for the accusations against Kavanaugh hadn't been presented to them. Voting against his nomination would have been a reaction to feelings rather than facts.

I personally feel that Kavanaugh is a giant "I went to Yale" dude bro who should have been passed over for one of Trump's other Court nominee finalists anyway. But I can still separate that out from my opinion on whether or not his nomination process gave his accusers a fair shake at providing evidence that would have destroyed his chances for sure. They didn't. And the left should acknowledge it.

In a criminal trial the presumption is innocence. Everything else you said is

 

[floridays]

Random but needed.. A sexual predator hiding in the bushes.

To be honest, I prefer none of the three. George W would be the least of the miscreants in my opinion. I love this country as founded, don't want a D or R to run through us. My stance, my opinion, that is where I stand.

 

[floridays]

Was telling a neighbor tonight how I've thought about the Kavanaugh situation:

In a criminal trial, a jury finds the defendant either "guilty" or "not guilty" of a crime or crimes. They don't say "This guy is innocent!" Why? Because the accused might very well have committed the crime (think OJ Simpson). But their guilt has to be proven using facts and evidence. If those things are not provided, the accused can't be declared guilty. So "not guilty" might mean nothing more than "No evidence to support the charge". Not "this guy definitely didn't do it".

So I think about the position the swing Senators like Susan Collins and Jeff Flake were in over the weekend. And I frame their decisions to vote yes to Kavanaugh as having found him "Not guilty" of the accusations. Because they had a choice to make, and supporting evidence for the accusations against Kavanaugh hadn't been presented to them. Voting against his nomination would have been a reaction to feelings rather than facts.

I personally feel that Kavanaugh is a giant "I went to Yale" dude bro who should have been passed over for one of Trump's other Court nominee finalists anyway. But I can still separate that out from my opinion on whether or not his nomination process gave his accusers a fair shake at providing evidence that would have destroyed his chances for sure. They didn't. And the left should acknowledge it.

Hey brother, I like you, You've been nice to me, I have returned in kind.... because I wanted to. I would just suggest you evaluate things legally and not from feelings, just my observation.