The silence is stunning. Refreshingly stunning, but stunning none the less.They have no answer for this, other than to say BUSH started 2 wars.
Thats the extent of the intelligence, for them.
Peace.
The silence is stunning. Refreshingly stunning, but stunning none the less.They have no answer for this, other than to say BUSH started 2 wars.
Thats the extent of the intelligence, for them.
Peace.
You don't know how many attacks may have been broken up......you & I are not privy to that info.........so don't talk like you're in the deep dark secret service when all you are is a purple people eater!For those of you insisting that torture, aka enhanced interrogation techniques work, I have a question. Since Steve King and Dick Cheney insisted on bringing it up, do you remember what the arguement was? Wasn't it that torture needed to be used to stop an attack that was "just around the corner"? An attack that was a "ticking time bomb"? An attack that Jack Bauer types only had 24 hours or less to stop? And yet here we are 9 1/2 years later and the torture supporters are trying to claim that their techniques worked. If those techniques worked, we would have had bin Laden in 2003. So how exactly is it that EIT is responsible for bin Laden's demise and not other interrogation techniques?
The silence is stunning. Refreshingly stunning, but stunning none the less.
I heard it just a little different, he had a local chieftain's actions endangering his troops, so he quickly changed that man's mind, for the good of his men.
That is what is called a leader, placing the troops' well being ahead of his personal ambitions.
"Why not just re-elect bhos if youre looking for another idiot to run our military.".... fixed it for ya
People have lives.....especially on mother's day.
You don't know how many attacks may have been broken up......you & I are not privy to that info.........so don't talk like you're in the deep dark secret service when all you are is a purple people eater!
For your reading pleasure; more, you are smarter than that. To say that "you and I are not privy to that info" is indicating that information we do not know can vindicate us; this is akin to saying that the Flying Spaghetti Monster can prove me right because no one can prove him wrong.
For your reading pleasure; more, you are smarter than that. To say that "you and I are not privy to that info" is indicating that information we do not know can vindicate us; this is akin to saying that the Flying Spaghetti Monster can prove me right because no one can prove him wrong.
Lately I've been hanging out at the Church of Reality.I worshipped at the Flying Spaghetti Monster Church today. All you have to do is have faith, and read "The Gerbil", the Flying Spaghetti Monster holy book.
PASTA 10:2
For those of you insisting that torture, aka enhanced interrogation techniques work, I have a question. Since Steve King and Dick Cheney insisted on bringing it up, do you remember what the arguement was? Wasn't it that torture needed to be used to stop an attack that was "just around the corner"? An attack that was a "ticking time bomb"? An attack that Jack Bauer types only had 24 hours or less to stop? And yet here we are 9 1/2 years later and the torture supporters are trying to claim that their techniques worked. If those techniques worked, we would have had bin Laden in 2003. So how exactly is it that EIT is responsible for bin Laden's demise and not other interrogation techniques?
They have no answer for this, other than to say BUSH started 2 wars.
Thats the extent of the intelligence, for them.
Peace.
You do realize they will counter with Obama starting war in Libya.
They don't know the United Nations voted upon it, and actually started it, and actually the French were the first to bomb Libya.
But, that's ok.
Atleast my fellowman Hitler won't be blamed anymore for starting the war, it was Roosevelt !
I'm not sure you linked article pertains to Morelucks statement. She said you didn't know how many attacks MAY have been broken up because you are not privy to that info. It could have been none or 100. Now either you are or aren't privy to the info, unless you are, that part of her statement was true. She didn't say there were any attacks broken up just that we didn't know.For your reading pleasure; more, you are smarter than that. To say that "you and I are not privy to that info" is indicating that information we do not know can vindicate us; this is akin to saying that the Flying Spaghetti Monster can prove me right because no one can prove him wrong.
I'm not sure you linked article pertains to Morelucks statement. She said you didn't know how many attacks MAY have been broken up because you are not privy to that info. It could have been none or 100. Now either you are or aren't privy to the info, unless you are, that part of her statement was true. She didn't say there were any attacks broken up just that we didn't know.
Wow. I just finished watching a documentary, and this analogy could have been part of it, indeed was part of it if not in those words.
Thanks Wkmac.
Dont need to hold my hand, but Ill take it as you dont have a clue why you would vote for him.
Alan West, a defense department lobbyist, and former military officer forced to quit his position in the military because he beat a prisoner, is your choice for president? He was convicted of violating military protocol and fined 5000 dollars and forced to retire, rather than face more stiffer charges that could have resulted in a dishonorable discharge.
Yes, he sounds like the kind of leader this country needs.
Another war monger.
Why not just re-elect bush if youre looking for another idiot to run our military.
Peace.