Yes, it was an interesting read, thanks traveler.
Did the article make it sound like the two were about equal to you?
Having to pay out $30,000 and gas money every day while working for
twelve hour daily without a lunch
and having to pay for your benefits and retirement seemed kind of glossed over to me in the comparison.
Calling having to pay for your benefits and retirement an
option to accept sounds almost rosy to me.
So did the ability to make $250,000 just by
buying more routes.
Or the ability to take two weeks off
without pay compared to five weeks with pay, etc.
To me it sounded like it was portrayed as six of one and a half dozen of the other when in fact, it's far from it in my opinion, although I admit my UPS bias here.