More expensive than a wildfire?
Fair enough.You got nothing because that's not what I said. There is no simple solution.
About tree fiddy.In addition to burning 18,800 structures, last year's Camp Fire alone killed 85. California is going to have to come up with a figure on what a life is worth (if the PG&E lawsuits haven't already) as these fires can move far faster than a person.
I thought you cleared every line you ever came across!?Even if you cleared every single line in the state it still would not stop wildfires from happening.
Like I said there is no simple solution. But I do know raking the forests sure as hell isn't one.Fair enough.
What was your solution that I overlooked?
Absolutely ridiculous to be able to sue the energy company for a wildfire.In addition to burning 18,800 structures, last year's Camp Fire alone killed 85. California is going to have to come up with a figure on what a life is worth (if the PG&E lawsuits haven't already) as these fires can move far faster than a person.
I'm pretty sure that was a requirement for UPS management.I thought you cleared every line you ever came across!?
But you defended allowing people to build in a wildfire zone. Should they not be held to the consequences of their decision?Like I said there is no simple solution. But I do know raking the forests sure as hell isn't one.
Same as someone who builds in a hurricane or tornado zone.But you defended allowing people to build in a wildfire zone. Should they not be held to the consequences of their decision?
you clear out the dried decaying wood and cleanup the pine needlesLike I said there is no simple solution. But I do know raking the forests sure as hell isn't one.
How about a controlled burn BEFORE the Santa Ana winds kick up?you clear out the dried decaying wood and cleanup the pine needles
There is a lot of things they can do, but they wont. They dont have the money to fight forest fires.How about a controlled burn BEFORE the Santa Ana winds kick up?
The resultant air pollution, and its effect on tourism, is why they won't use this tool.
California is backwards and being ruined by liberals, they have no housing to, gas prices are like 5 bucksHow about a controlled burn BEFORE the Santa Ana winds kick up?
The resultant air pollution, and its effect on tourism, is why they won't use this tool.
Just like the idiots that build on an ocean beachfront.But you defended allowing people to build in a wildfire zone. Should they not be held to the consequences of their decision?
and year after year get more ins. money to rebuild. same w/ wind/tornado damageJust like the idiots that build on an ocean beachfront.
its economically easier to be reactive and wait for federal disaster relief funds to kick inThere is a lot of things they can do, but they wont. They dont have the money to fight forest fires.