In all do respect, in over 90% of the time, the drunk one will get the beating, not the sober one.
Unless ofcourse the drunk one hits on a weak female or child. Which will land him in jail in any case.
What kind of girlie drunks do you hang out with?
And whats worse ? A drunk with a fist or a drunk with a gun ?
No I'm not being obtuse. I'm saying that getting drunk does not = assault. If someone hits you that's assault, whether they were drunk or not. They didn't "drink you to death".
We already have strict drinking laws, more stricter then your gun laws....
How about the "Judge" a handgun made by Taurus that shoots shotgun shells. The gun is named for the huge number of U.S. judges that "carry" the Judge into their courtrooms.
View attachment 4919I want this one. Well, actually I want all of them but this one I want first.![]()
When your government starts requiring background checks or waiting periods every time you buy a six pack...or tries to regulate how many ounces can be in each bottle...or subjects you to fingerprinting....or makes you register every bottle of beer you buy...... that will be an accurate statement. Until then its a crock of BS.
I am not going to compare a 6 pack of beer with a weapon. That's just not possible....
But, comparing a legal beverage to a deadly weapon, just makes no sense to me.
Both are inantimate objects that can be deadly if misused.
Both are legal but subject to certain restrictions.
Both are things that are desired by certain members of society but disliked by others.
The only difference is that those who are ignorant or scared of one of the objects wish to prohibit others from having them.
I'll driveLet's just mix a six pack, a pint and a glock just to see how much fun we can have. All inanimate objects...should be fun.
That is one of the reasons why I still like my 9. It's double action. All I have to do is pull the trigger. I realize that it does not have as much stopping power as a 45 but it does have other advantages.There is a reason that the 1911's are still going strong 100 years after they were originally designed. They are the small-block Chevy of pistols and they will undoubtedly be around for another 100 years. That being said, I would never choose one for concealed carry myself, I simply cannot handle the idea of carrying one "cocked and locked" even though I know that with a proper holster it is perfectly safe to do so.
That is one of the reasons why I still like my 9. It's double action. All I have to do is pull the trigger. I realize that it does not have as much stopping power as a 45 but it does have other advantages.![]()
I'll drive
I agree that the Judge would be a bad choice for a concealed carry gun (because of size and bulkiness), however for home defense I think it would be really good. The .410 will not go through more than one wall and does spread out a little. Close range it makes a really big hole with a huge punch. Home invaders would be in deep dodo.Those things are a gimmick in my opinion, and a terrible choice for self-defense. The .410 shotgun round was designed for children and recoil-sensitive people to hunt small game with. Its ballistics are totally inadequate for use as a self defense round. And in order to chamber the .410's the gun itself is far longer and bulkier than a conventional revolver. It only holds 5 rounds, you cant use speed loaders with it, and the empty .410 casings are too long for the ejector rod so you have to manually extract each one by hand. If I owned one I would load it with .45 Long Colt hollowpoints for defense, but if you are going to carry a revolver that big and heavy it ought to be a 6-shot .357 Magnum instead.
I agree that the Judge would be a bad choice for a concealed carry gun (because of size and bulkiness), however for home defense I think it would be really good. The .410 will not go through more than one wall and does spread out a little. Close range it makes a really big hole with a huge punch. Home invaders would be in deep dodo.