Iraq 10 years after
- Thread starter 804brown
- Start date
av8torntn
Well-Known Member
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_1441
Obviously those pre 1991 weapons were a part of it even though you prefer to think otherwise.
As a side note pictures of the banned missiles buried in Iraq are also available.
Do you read anything or research anything??
The agreement was a prohibition on the USE and the manufacturing and DISTRIBUTION of chemical weapons. There is NO OUT for REAGAN and Rumsfeld. They ILLEGALLY gave chemical and biological weapons to Saddam for use on the Iranians. He killed tens of thousands of Iranians with OUR gas.
These rotting weapons that were described in the times article, WERE NOT the weapons BUSH claimed existed prior to our invasion. The TIMES article writer HIMSELF explains this.
Only FOX news and its drones were silly enough to attempt to vindicate BUSH for his lies.
TOS.
And the desperation never ends. These BURIED, OUTDATED, ROTTING, DECAYING and UN USABLE weapons were discovered and "hidden" because of the USA involvement in putting them there.
Whats so hard to understand about that??
But heck, if it makes you feel better that 10000 men and women lost their lives hunting for 1980's rotting un usable weapons, then thats your right. I cant fix stupid.
TOS.
Delusion much?
Also the UN declared the invasion of Iraq illegal, not that we care about international law.
av8torntn
Well-Known Member
Troll
Without any evidence your claim that the U.S. hid chemical weapons in Iraq so they could find them decades later is absurd.[/quote]
av8torntn
Well-Known Member
[/quote]
nobody said that but yourself. thus, you are correct, its absurd. Stay focused. try not sounding like your sinking in the bath water.
TOS.
The name calling speaks volumes.
av8torntn
Well-Known Member
av8torntn
Well-Known Member
I find it interesting how those on those one the left want to obey the UN until it is pointed out that they approved our efforts to disarm those wmds that Iraq had.
I welcome facts. To claim that the pre-1991 chemical weapons that had been discarded was a justification for war under Article 1441 is to ignore reality.
The discarded weapons found are not the WMDs that were used for the justification of the war. You don't seem to grasp that.
From the wiki article you linked:
Aftermath
In June 2006, the National Ground Intelligence Center (NGIC), a US Department of Defense entity, released a report detailing the weapons of mass destruction that had been found in Iraq, including pre-1991 sarin gas and mustard agent. The report stated that, "While agents degrade over time, chemical warfare agents remain hazardous and potentially lethal."[14]
The Bush administration commissioned the Iraq Survey Group to determine whether in fact any WMD existed in Iraq. After a year and half of meticulously combing through the country, the administration’s own inspectors reported:[15]
“ "While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad’s desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear of force against it should WMD be discovered." ”
The review was conducted by Charles A. Duelfer and the Iraq Survey Group. In October 2004, Bush said of Duelfer’s analysis:[16] "The chief weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, has now issued a comprehensive report that confirms the earlier conclusion of David Kay that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were there."
Factual questions about the Iraqi declaration still remain. To date the contents have still not been made public for independent scrutiny.[17] When the UK government was asked to state where in the Iraqi government's declaration there were false or inaccurate statements, the reply was that it was a confidential matter and that "huge quantities of documents remain to be translated."[18]
Your desperation is laughable. The times writer who did the investigation completely disagrees with you and pointed that out in Steven Colberts interview, but you continue to push for a "truth" that just doesnt add up.
There were no "active" weapons of mass destruction in IRAQ, and weapons like these, supplied by the USA and its western partners were buried to rot because they were un usable by Saddam. Hans Blix found many of these outdated weapons when he was inspecting Iraq and they were targeted for destruction and removal.
The IRAQI government failed to do so.
Because this discovery was made during the BUSH administration, it was covered up. Like all the other lies about the IRAQ war. Its a fact bro. Give this one up.
BUSH was not vindicated on this find and the writer states that very clearly. All you have to do now is accept it.
During the war, you were so gung-ho, and it was laughable then as it is now.
TOS.
av8torntn
Well-Known Member
Troll and troll too
To quote "remove and destroy all chemical and biological weapons" and you come to the conclusion that is supposed to mean all but what they had?
Certainly no surprise tou both vote dimocrat.
I suppose you think that if you repeat it enough that it will somehow become true.
To quote "remove and destroy all chemical and biological weapons" and you come to the conclusion that is supposed to mean all but what they had?
Certainly no surprise tou both vote dimocrat.
I suppose you think that if you repeat it enough that it will somehow become true.
av8torntn
Well-Known Member
Similar threads
