MrFedEx
Engorged Member
this whole thread is illogical.
libertarians are loners they have never been part of any group including a "lot"
I actually agree with you. I can't believe it.
this whole thread is illogical.
libertarians are loners they have never been part of any group including a "lot"
Trump is still your president fren.
The Civil War.And that was complete gibberish in you are advocating. There must have been a reason we went to a strong central government
Trump is still your president fren.Nah, he belongs to you. Own Somalia, because it's Libertarianism at it's best. Everyone does what they want, with basically zero government. Essentially total freedom by your insane standards.
A DIDO and OMJ paradise. You two can even get married there.
Move now, fren.
Like most liberals, Republicans included, you have confused anarchy and libertarianism.this whole thread is illogical.
libertarians are loners they have never been part of any group including a "lot"
A civil war, two world wars and a Great Depression. Once those extreme measures were taken it opened the flood gates for bastards like LBJ.And that was complete gibberish in you are advocating. There must have been a reason we went to a strong central government
The War of Northern Aggression ?The Civil War.
The War of Northern Aggression ?
Like most liberals, Republicans included, you have confused anarchy and libertarianism.
Obviously @Jones is clueless.Many people here do not understand libertarianism, Libertarians, right and left, etc.
One thing I think most people understand is that libertarians don’t like the Repugs but dislike the DemWits even more.Many people here do not understand libertarianism, Libertarians, right and left, etc.
I think you're the one who is confused. Libertarianism would create anarchy, just like it has in Somalia. Pack your bags, fren. You and OMJ would just love being around all of those black folks too.
Maybe when Trump is deposed, he'll move there and be your Supreme Leader.
The Koch brothers called themselves classical liberals.You are going with the (incorrect) definition of Libertarianism that says individuals should be able to make social and economic decisions free from government interference. That's actually the definition of anarcho-capitalism. Some anarcho-capitalists call themselves libertarians, but that's not strictly correct. If you prefer, you can think of most people who subscribe to Libertarianism as classical liberals.
So ignorant!I think you're the one who is confused. Libertarianism would create anarchy, just like it has in Somalia. Pack your bags, fren. You and OMJ would just love being around all of those black folks too.
Maybe when Trump is deposed, he'll move there and be your Supreme Leader.
Which sure the hell doesn’t apply to anyone in the DemWit party.The Koch brothers called themselves classical liberals.
Generally, the worst parts of the Dems (economics) and Repubs (social) tends to come out in full force so both parties are useless to me.One thing I think most people understand is that libertarians don’t like the Repugs but dislike the DemWits even more.
Yep!Generally, the worst parts of the Dems (economics) and Repubs (social) tends to come out in full force so both parties are useless to me.
The Economy Under Democratic vs. Republican Presidents - Reports - United States Joint Economic CommitteeGenerally, the worst parts of the Dems (economics) and Repubs (social) tends to come out in full force so both parties are useless to me.