Looks like Gen. Flynn was framed.

[Old Man Jingles]

The coming convictions will speak for themselves!

Yep ... like the eternal saying goes, what goes around, comes around.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

of course it is liberals love it when big government threatens a member of the opposition into a forced confession.

Or staying indoors.

 

[floridays]

A nice read, Sidney Powell throws some shade to the former Constitutional professor and first half black President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama


OPEN MEMORANDUM
To: Barack Hussein Obama
From: Sidney Powell
www.SidneyPowell.com

Date: May 13, 2020

Re: Your Failure to Find Precedent for Flynn Dismissal

Regarding the decision of the Department of Justice to dismiss charges against General Flynn, in your recent call with your alumni, you expressed great concern: “there is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic — not just institutional norms — but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk.”

Here is some help—if truth and precedent represent your true concern. Your statement is entirely false. However, it does explain the damage to the Rule of Law throughout your administration.

Read the rest of her dressing down of Barack Hussein Obama, first half black president and former Constitutional professor.

Open Memorandum to Barack Obama | Sidney Powell

 

[Benben]

The coming convictions will speak for themselves!

What's the word I am looking for..........

Oh yeah,

Conspiracy Theory

 

[UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)]

What's the word I am looking for..........

Oh yeah,

Conspiracy Theory

That would be two words.

 

[fishtm2001]

DOJ’s claims to have discovered “new” information since the sentencing memo are not supported by any proof and are in fact refuted by the public record.

 

[fishtm2001]

DOJ’s claims to have discovered “new” information since the sentencing memo are not supported by any proof and are in fact refuted by the public record.

"...all of the facts on which this motion to dismiss relies — that the FBI hadn’t found anything in its counterintelligence investigation into Flynn, but decided to keep it open in early January 2017 when they discovered the Kislyak transcripts, and that people in DOJ and FBI had conflicting understandings of the status of the investigation leading up to the interview — has not only been known to DOJ but has been public since March 22, 2018, when Republicans released it in their Russian Report."

EW

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

"...all of the facts on which this motion to dismiss relies — that the FBI hadn’t found anything in its counterintelligence investigation into Flynn, but decided to keep it open in early January 2017 when they discovered the Kislyak transcripts, and that people in DOJ and FBI had conflicting understandings of the status of the investigation leading up to the interview — has not only been known to DOJ but has been public since March 22, 2018, when Republicans released it in their Russian Report."

EW

You're quoting someone who basically worked for Robert Mueller in his failed coup attempt. Is that all you got?

 

[fishtm2001]

You're quoting someone who basically worked for Robert Mueller in his failed coup attempt. Is that all you got?

wrong as usual

 

[fishtm2001]

the FBI has gone on the record to say that records had already been shared with DOJ IG (which completed a report in December that didn’t treat them as unusual) and the John Durham inquiry (which began a year ago).

 

[newfie]

DOJ’s claims to have discovered “new” information since the sentencing memo are not supported by any proof and are in fact refuted by the public record.

Not true. It's been proven in the IG investigation that the DOJ with held exculpatory evidence and mispresented other evidence. You can't just make up.

 

[newfie]

"...all of the facts on which this motion to dismiss relies — that the FBI hadn’t found anything in its counterintelligence investigation into Flynn, but decided to keep it open in early January 2017 when they discovered the Kislyak transcripts, and that people in DOJ and FBI had conflicting understandings of the status of the investigation leading up to the interview — has not only been known to DOJ but has been public since March 22, 2018, when Republicans released it in their Russian Report."

EW

Again disproven this week . You're fake news

 

[fishtm2001]

Not true. It's been proven in the IG investigation that the DOJ with held exculpatory evidence and mispresented other evidence. You can't just make up.

"Trump’s Acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein agreed Flynn’s lies were material when he approved false statement charges against Flynn in December 2017, Trump’s Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker’s DOJ argued Flynn’s lies were material when DOJ moved to sentencing in December 2018, Bill Barr’s DOJ argued “the FBI was engaged in a legitimate and significant investigation,” when it successfully defeated a request to dismiss the prosecution last fall, and Barr’s DOJ argued Flynn’s lies were material in January."

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

wrong as usual

It's a fact. And now she is disgraced in her field because of it. No one takes that dumb bitch seriously but you.

 

[fishtm2001]

It's a fact. And now she is disgraced in her field because of it. No one takes that dumb bitch seriously but you.

supporting link?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

supporting link?

That's rich coming from you, the guy who copy-pastes from communist publications multiple times a day without ever linking to the source. Which is against the terms of service of this forum by the way.

 

[newfie]

"Trump’s Acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein agreed Flynn’s lies were material when he approved false statement charges against Flynn in December 2017, Trump’s Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker’s DOJ argued Flynn’s lies were material when DOJ moved to sentencing in December 2018, Bill Barr’s DOJ argued “the FBI was engaged in a legitimate and significant investigation,” when it successfully defeated a request to dismiss the prosecution last fall, and Barr’s DOJ argued Flynn’s lies were material in January."

probably another reason why rosenstien is out of a job. bad judgement.

 

[Babagounj]

Finally I understand why Judge Sullivan won't make a decision on dismissing General Flynn's case.
He is stalling until Biden gets elected.
Well, that might not work.
15 Attorneys General Unite To File Amicus Brief In Support Of DOJ Decision To Drop Charges Against Flynn

 

[Benben]

Finally I understand why Judge Sullivan won't make a decision on dismissing General Flynn's case.
He is stalling until Biden gets elected.
Well, that might not work.
15 Attorneys General Unite To File Amicus Brief In Support Of DOJ Decision To Drop Charges Against Flynn

The problem is all 15 are republicans. This does nothing to help make the whole situation look any less political!

 

[Mutineer]

The problem is all 15 are republicans. This does nothing to help make the whole situation look any less political!

Anymore, it's obvious that neither side gives a rat's patootie how "political" anything looks!