DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
13/52
Open Carry
- Thread starter Zowert
- Start date
Babagounj
Strength through joy
ATF: Pot Users Can't Legally Own Firearms Regardless Of State Laws | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
According to the St. Paul ATF office, because marijuana is still illegal at the federal level, people who smoke weed or take marijuana edibles are "still federally defined as an 'unlawful user' of a controlled substance," and are therefore "prohibited from shipping, transporting, receiving, or possessing firearms or ammunition."
According to the Second Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.ATF: Pot Users Can't Legally Own Firearms Regardless Of State Laws | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
According to the St. Paul ATF office, because marijuana is still illegal at the federal level, people who smoke weed or take marijuana edibles are "still federally defined as an 'unlawful user' of a controlled substance," and are therefore "prohibited from shipping, transporting, receiving, or possessing firearms or ammunition."
I have NOT been lurking
Degenerate Member
It's 60 now
Sacrificial Lamb
Package Shepherd
They’re more prone to emotional outbursts.
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
No substance abusers
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Because they are mentally ill.
Shall not be infringed.
Commercial Inside Release
Well-Known Member
Saw the Minnesota politicians arguing over that... Minnesota politics & social issues are downright disturbing.ATF: Pot Users Can't Legally Own Firearms Regardless Of State Laws | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
According to the St. Paul ATF office, because marijuana is still illegal at the federal level, people who smoke weed or take marijuana edibles are "still federally defined as an 'unlawful user' of a controlled substance," and are therefore "prohibited from shipping, transporting, receiving, or possessing firearms or ammunition."
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
I don’t make the rules. Not everyone should have a firearm. If you’re a drunk or drug addict, you have mental issues. You need to get help, get clean and apply after that.
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
They’re losing all common sense in that state.
Sacrificial Lamb
Package Shepherd
Any law diminishing or ie weakening the right to bear and have access to arms is infringing.
Etymologically helping.
The founders made the rules. I like the one that says "Shall not be infringed."
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Mentally unstable people can’t have firearms
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Mentally ill can’t have guns
They let monkeys do whatever they want three years ago. Stealing TVs. Throwing feces. Minneapolis is a zoo.
Sacrificial Lamb
Package Shepherd
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
A well regulated militia implies a standard.
Johney
Well-Known Member
Right, but on the Federal form you fill out to buy a firearm it asks if you have ever used illegal drugs and at this time marijauna is still federally illegal. If I were a pot smoker(which I am no)I just keep getting it illegally and not let anyone know. The minute you get a marijuana card in any state how can you legally buy a firearm?
