This is the part I have trouble with. How do you know 2 of the union reps said "no" to his job?
How do you know "the union vote against him"?
Were you there or just heard it from him?
You know what? I learnt a long time ago to never take any info 2nd, 3rd, 4th hand. It's always gonna be slanted the way the 2nd, 3rd, 4th person wants it to go or THINKS it should go.
And you know what else? If I was fired and couldn't come back, I'd probably say the same thing, even if it were not true, just to save face and make everyone else look bad. Has that ever happened before? Hmmm....maybe.
In all the years here, I've NEVER seen prejudice against an hourly by the "union reps", even if those hourlies were absolute SLUGS! Sure, there's been talk of "deals", "under the table plans", etc, but in the end, I've always seen the person treated fairly by the "union reps". Remember, I said, HERE!!! For all of you that come here to blast me and say it ain't so where you live.
If you think there's more to the story, we'd sure like to hear it. Or if you KNOW, personally, more of the story. If you were actually in on this meeting, we'd like to see it.