Newfie and Brownstuff,
what is it about you two that makes you guys think you know more than the US COURT OF APPEALS..in different jurisdictions? Why do you think you know more about the law and what is legal than the courts?
Let's try one more time to explain this to you...
When a person REGISTERS to vote, they must prove their citizenship at THAT TIME. Once they are qualified to VOTE, they are placed onto the voter registration rolls and assigned a polling place.
There is no FURTHER need to identify themselves at the polls, beyond establishing they are the person on the voter rolls. They can use a utility bill, a license, an id card of any form or birth certificate and these NEW laws were designed to make it near impossible for some minorities and old people to vote.
Like this case of an old white woman in texas who was not allowed to vote because of the texas voter id law..
92-year-old Texas woman denied photo ID to vote: “Not to be able to vote breaks my heart”
She wasnt black, she wasnt a minority, and she wasnt illegal. But the LAW's real intention did what it was designed to do, LIMIT VOTERS.
Every single appellate court AGREES with ME and not YOU two.
WISCONSINs voter ID laws were also TOSSED out on Friday by the courts...
Parts of Wisconsin voter ID law are unconstitutional, court rules
While the two of you attempt to justify voter suppression ( because you are brainwashed to ) the nation is seeing these laws for what they are...
UNCONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT WING GARBAGE.
TOS.